uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Taxation of Cryptocurrencies from the Danish and Swedish Perspectives
Copenhagen Business Sch, Copenhagen, Denmark;CORIT Advisory, Lyngby, Denmark.
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Law, Department of Law.
2019 (English)In: Intertax, ISSN 0165-2826, E-ISSN 1875-8347, Vol. 47, no 6-7, p. 620-634Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The authors analyse the current classification of cryptocurrencies from the Danish and Swedish domestic income tax perspectives. Cryptocurrencies are analysed as they are typically applied in practice, where a categorization is made between coins, utility tokens, security tokens and asset tokens. In particular, it is concluded that despite the economic differences of different cryptocurrencies, they generally fall outside the scope of Danish and Swedish lex specialis regulation on taxation of capital gains and losses from the sale of certain assets, for example, shares and claims in currency. In both countries, there appears to be a presumption that most cryptocurrencies should be taxed as assets held for investment and speculative purposes. It is argued that such an approach is problematic not only in relation to the principle of neutrality, but also because it creates a barrier to realizing the economic potential of cryptocurrencies. The authors conclude that (1) the classification of cryptocurrencies poses challenges and uncertainty for tax purposes due to the lack of a regulatory framework, the absence of common definitions and the diverse technical structure of tokens and coins and (2) the classification for Danish and Swedish tax law purposes should be based on a case-by-case assessment of the specific cryptocurrency.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Kluwer Law International, 2019. Vol. 47, no 6-7, p. 620-634
National Category
Economics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-386365ISI: 000468221100007OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-386365DiVA, id: diva2:1327424
Available from: 2019-06-19 Created: 2019-06-19 Last updated: 2019-06-24Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Authority records BETA

Arfwidsson, Autilia

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Arfwidsson, Autilia
By organisation
Department of Law
In the same journal
Intertax
Economics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 35 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf