uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Flooding Luleå city: Perspectives on hydropower, mining, dam safety and flood risk governance
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Theology, Centre for Multidisciplinary Studies on Racism. LTU history. (Dálkke)ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2820-0584
2019 (English)Conference paper, Oral presentation only (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

Luleå city is located downstream of 18 hydropower dams of which the majority are classified as high consequence, meaning that if there is a dam failure, there will be severe consequences downstream. The highest risk for dam failure is when the dams are full, October to about end January each year, i.e. the coldest part of the year. In a worst case scenario water (and ice) levels may rise up to 5-6 meters in the central parts, within less than 48 hours.  Dam safety work entered the international dam sector agenda in the 1970s, after the Teton dam failure in the US. In Sweden, attention to and work with the risk of dam failure began the 1980s, as the hydropower construction era ended.

The recent tailing dam failure in Brasil has drawn public attention to the risks with the dams used to store waste from mines. While a major tailing dam failed in Finland (Talvivaara) in 2013, so far Sweden has been spared from major disasters.

What is so far unknown of in Sweden, and rarely discussed, is the combination of the two systems; tailing dams and hydropower dams in the same river, as well as and the risks and governance complexities thereto associated. Yet this is of importance to Luleå, as since 2011 there are plans for a mine within the Lule River, at Kallak/Gállok. This would bring two high consequence systems together, with two different main responsible actors – Vattenfall on the one hand, and the owner of the mine on the other. The public and decision makers have so far had little knowledge/understanding of the risks of such combination. Based on interviews and participatory observations within four research projects funded by the Swedish research council (VR) and FORMAS (since 2008) I will discuss the complexities for flood governance.

 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2019.
Keywords [en]
Dam safety, Lule river, Kallak, Gállok, Hydropower, Mining, Tailing dams, hydropower dams
National Category
History of Technology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-392164OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-392164DiVA, id: diva2:1347070
Conference
NESS2019: Social Science in Our Time, Luleå University of Technology June 9-12, 2019
Projects
Dálkke: Indigenous Climate Change Studies
Funder
Swedish Research Council Formas, 2017-01923
Note

Funded by FORMAS within the Swedish National Research Program on Climate

Available from: 2019-08-30 Created: 2019-08-30 Last updated: 2019-08-30

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Öhman, May-Britt
By organisation
Centre for Multidisciplinary Studies on Racism
History of Technology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 98 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf