uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Do citizens use storytelling or rational argumentation to lobby politicians?
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Government.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5921-0983
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Government. Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Statistics.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3522-4966
Södertörns högskola.
2019 (English)In: Policy and politics (Print), ISSN 0305-5736, E-ISSN 1470-8442, Vol. 47, no 4, p. 543-559Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2019. Vol. 47, no 4, p. 543-559
Keywords [en]
communication; deliberation; everyday politics; immigration; narrative; norms; reasons; storytelling
National Category
Political Science (excluding Public Administration Studies and Globalisation Studies)
Research subject
Political Science
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-393208DOI: 10.1332/030557319X15613700896551ISI: 000492362900002OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-393208DiVA, id: diva2:1352100
Funder
Swedish Research Council, 2014-811
Note

What should count as legitimate forms of reasoning in public deliberation is a contested issue. Democratic theorists have argued that storytelling may offer a more accessible form of deliberation for marginalised citizens than ‘rational argumentation’. We investigate the empirical support for this claim by examining Swedish citizens’ use of storytelling in written communication with the political establishment. We test whether stories are used frequently, as well as by whom, and how they are used. We find that storytelling is (1) rare, (2) not more frequent among people with nonmainstream views, and (3) used together with rational argumentation. In line with some previous research, we show that stories still play other important roles: authorising the author, undermining political opponents and, most often, further supporting arguments made in ‘rational’ form. The results suggest that people rely more on rational argumentation than storytelling when expecting interlocutors to be hostile to their views.

Available from: 2019-09-17 Created: 2019-09-17 Last updated: 2019-11-15Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full texthttps://www.ingentaconnect.com/contentone/tpp/pap/2019/00000047/00000004/art00002#

Authority records BETA

Holdo, MarkusÖberg, PerOla

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Holdo, MarkusÖberg, PerOla
By organisation
Department of GovernmentDepartment of Statistics
In the same journal
Policy and politics (Print)
Political Science (excluding Public Administration Studies and Globalisation Studies)

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 87 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf