uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Checking mask ventilation before neuromuscular block: A nation-wide survey of anaesthetists' attitudes and thinking
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgical Sciences, Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5007-7028
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgical Sciences, Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care. Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Health Services Research.
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgical Sciences, Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care.
2019 (English)In: Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, ISSN 0001-5172, E-ISSN 1399-6576, Vol. 63, no 9, p. 1178-1183Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: The value of checking mask ventilation before administering neuromuscular blocking drugs is still debated.

Method: We conducted a survey of the practice of anaesthetists in Sweden, first asking if they use a mask ventilation trial (MVT) as part of routine induction with intubation (not rapid sequence induction or expected difficult airway). We focused on the reasons for or against the MVT, probing the anaesthetists' attitudes in general but also in specific scenarios.

Results: The response rate was 54%. We found that 65.1% routinely use a MVT, 21.4% sometimes do and 13.5% never do so. There was no effect for years of experience on the distribution. The most common reason for checking mask ventilation was "to gather information about the airway," while the reason for not using the MVT was mostly "that muscle relaxation often improves mask ventilation."

Conclusion: We found several interesting comments about airway management at both practical and theoretical levels. The survey highlights that routinely performing a MVT is a common practice in Sweden in spite of the lack of evidence for increased patient safety. Future airway guidelines may need to address this practice.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
WILEY , 2019. Vol. 63, no 9, p. 1178-1183
National Category
Anesthesiology and Intensive Care
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-396123DOI: 10.1111/aas.13426ISI: 000481427700001PubMedID: 31359434OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-396123DiVA, id: diva2:1366784
Available from: 2019-10-30 Created: 2019-10-30 Last updated: 2019-10-30Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records BETA

Saastamoinen, MarcusLarsson, JanFrykholm, Peter

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Saastamoinen, MarcusLarsson, JanFrykholm, Peter
By organisation
Anaesthesiology and Intensive CareHealth Services Research
In the same journal
Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
Anesthesiology and Intensive Care

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 5 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf