uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Peritonectomy with high voltage electrocautery generates higher levels of ultrafine smoke particles
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgical Sciences, Colorectal Surgery.
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Sciences. (Eva Vingård)
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Sciences. (Eva Vingård)
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Sciences. (Eva Vingård)
Show others and affiliations
2008 (English)In: European Journal of Surgical Oncology, ISSN 0748-7983, E-ISSN 1532-2157, Vol. 35, no 7, 780-784 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND: To adequately perform peritonectomy, the use of an electrocautery device at a high voltage is recommended. The aim of this study was to analyse the amount of airborne and ultrafine particles (UFP) generated during peritonectomy and to compare this with standard colon and rectal cancer surgery (CRC). METHOD: UFP was measured approximately 2-3cm from the breathing area of the surgeon (personal sampling) and 3m from where the electrocautery smoke was generated (stationary sampling) from 14 consecutive peritonectomy procedures and 11 standard CRC resections. The sampling was by P-Trak UFP counter that has the capacity to detect particle size ranging from 0.02 to 1mum. RESULTS: The cumulative level of UFP of personal sampling in the peritonectomy group was higher (9.3x10(6)particle/ml/h (pt/ml/h)) than in the control group (4.8x10(5)pt/ml/h). A higher cumulative level of UFP in stationary sampling was observed in the PC group (2.6x10(6) pt/ml/h) than in the control group (3.9x10(4)pt/ml/h). CONCLUSION: Peritonectomy procedure with high voltage electrocautery generates elevated levels of UFP than standard CRC surgery does. The level of UFP produced by a peritonectomy is comparable to cigarette smoking. More efficient smoke evacuator systems are needed in order to reduce the levels of UFP generated during electrocautery surgery.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2008. Vol. 35, no 7, 780-784 p.
Keyword [en]
Peritonectomy, Peritoneal carcinomatosis, Ultrafine particles, Occupational
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-88197DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2008.09.002ISI: 000267301700018PubMedID: 18922668OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-88197DiVA: diva2:139560
Available from: 2009-01-23 Created: 2009-01-23 Last updated: 2017-12-14Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Work Environment in the Operating Room during Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy: Factors Influencing Choice of Protective Equipment
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Work Environment in the Operating Room during Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy: Factors Influencing Choice of Protective Equipment
2011 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) is a common metastatic manifestation of both gastrointestinal and gynecological malignancies. Curative modes of treatment are cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with intraoperative hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Surgeons and operating room (OR) staff attending these procedures are exposed to chemotherapy and electrocautery smoke. Heated chemotherapy (HIPEC) may vaporize and become inhaled by those administering it and, moreover, large quantities of electrocautery smoke may also be inhaled by surgeons and OR staff, with unknown adverse health effects. The general aim of this thesis was to investigate the work environment during major abdominal surgery and HIPEC, and to map the factors influencing the behavior of OR nurses and surgeons when choosing protective equipment against electrocautery smoke.

To determine the presence of platinum, a total of 36 blood and 36 urine samples were collected from one surgeon and one perfusionist during six oxaliplatin-based HIPEC treatments (Paper I). Regarding electrocautery smoke, amounts of ultrafine particles (UFPs) in the smoke from 14 CRS procedures and 11 colorectal cancer (CRC) procedures were collected and compared (Paper II). Additionally, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) were identified and quantified in electrocautery smoke during 40 CRS procedures (Paper III). Lastly, seven OR nurses and seven surgeons were interviewed individually to explore what factors influenced their behavior when choosing protective equipment against electrocautery smoke. The transcribed texts were analyzed with qualitative content analysis (Paper IV).

All blood and urine samples were below the detection limit (Paper I). The amount of UFPs produced during CRS procedures was significantly higher than from CRC procedures (Paper II), and PAHs never exceeded Swedish occupational exposure limits (OELs) (Paper III). OR nurses and surgeons had a knowledge of electrocautery smoke and were aware of risks. However, external factors governed the use of protective equipment against electrocautery smoke (Paper IV).

HIPEC with oxaliplatin seems to present no risk for treatment givers. However, the possible risks from exposure of cumulative amounts of UFPs and PAHs are still unknown. OR nurses’ and surgeons’ knowledge about the possible risks of electrocautery smoke, and the use of protective equipment, are therefore important.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis, 2011. 85 p.
Series
Digital Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Medicine, ISSN 1651-6206 ; 716
National Category
Surgery
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-159945 (URN)978-91-554-8196-4 (ISBN)
Public defence
2011-12-16, Auditorium Minus, Gustavianum, Akademigatan 3, Uppsala, 13:15 (Swedish)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2011-11-24 Created: 2011-10-12 Last updated: 2012-01-03

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records BETA

Andréasson, Sara NäslundAnundi, HelenaSahlberg, BoWålinder, RobertPåhlman, LarsMahteme, Haile

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Andréasson, Sara NäslundAnundi, HelenaSahlberg, BoWålinder, RobertPåhlman, LarsMahteme, Haile
By organisation
Colorectal SurgeryDepartment of Medical Sciences
In the same journal
European Journal of Surgical Oncology
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 563 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf