uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
E-mail access and improved communication between patient and surgeon
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgical Sciences, Endocrine Surgery.
Show others and affiliations
2008 (English)In: Archives of surgery (Chicago. 1960), ISSN 0004-0010, Vol. 143, no 2, 164-8; discussion 168-9 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effectiveness of e-mail communication between surgeon and patient prior to elective surgery. DESIGN: Prospective randomized study. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: One hundred consecutive patients presenting for consultation prior to undergoing thyroid or parathyroid surgery. INTERVENTION: All were randomized to either receiving an information sheet promoting e-mail communication as the preferred method of communication (group E) or a standard information sheet (group S). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: (1) Use of communication with the surgeon outside of the booked preoperative and postoperative consultation and (2) satisfaction questionnaire. RESULTS: Overall, 26 of 100 patients (26%) initiated additional perioperative communication with the surgeon, 19 of 50 (38%) in group E and 7 of 50 (14%) in group S (P < .001). Of those who initiated communication, 22 of 26 (84%) did so by e-mail; 3 (12%), by fax; and 1 (4%), by telephone. For patients using e-mail, 18 of 22 (81%) were in group E and 4 of 22 (18%), in group S (P < .02). Overall, 34 e-mails were sent by 22 patients in the study group. Most e-mails sent focused on only 1 issue; however, some patients raised multiple issues, with the most being 4 issues in a single e-mail. There were no differences in any of the outcome measures in relation to patient satisfaction with communication. CONCLUSION: Despite concerns about potential medicolegal issues and other disadvantages, providing patients undergoing elective surgery with e-mail access to their surgeon results in improved levels of communication without any demonstrated impairment of satisfaction with outcomes.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2008. Vol. 143, no 2, 164-8; discussion 168-9 p.
Keyword [en]
e-mail communication, surgeon, patient
National Category
Surgery
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-88375DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.2007.31PubMedID: 18283141OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-88375DiVA: diva2:158207
Available from: 2009-01-30 Created: 2009-01-30 Last updated: 2013-11-06Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records BETA

Stalberg, Peter

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Stalberg, Peter
By organisation
Endocrine Surgery
In the same journal
Archives of surgery (Chicago. 1960)
Surgery

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 531 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf