uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Absolute risk reductions for local recurrence after postoperative radiotherapy after sector resection for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast
Uppsala University, Medicinska vetenskapsområdet, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgical Sciences, Endocrine Surgery.
Show others and affiliations
2008 (English)In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, ISSN 0732-183X, Vol. 26, no 8, 1247-52 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

PURPOSE: Evaluate the effects of radiotherapy after sector resection for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast (DCIS) in patient groups as defined by age, size of the lesion, focality, completeness of excision and mode of detection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 1,067 women in Sweden were randomly assigned to either postoperative radiotherapy (RT) or control from 1987 to 1999, and 1,046 were followed for a mean of 8 years. The main outcome was new ipsilateral breast cancer events and distant metastasis-free survival analyzed according to intention to treat. RESULTS: There were 64 ipsilateral events in the RT arm and 141 in the control group corresponding to a risk reduction of 16.0 percentage points at 10 years (95% CI, 10.3% to 21.6%) and a relative risk of 0.40 (95% CI, 0.30 to 0.54). There was no statistically significant difference in distant metastasis-free survival. There was an effect modification by age, yielding a low effect of RT in women younger than 50, but substantial protection in women older than 60 years. The age effect was not confounded by focality, lesion size, completeness of excision, or detection mode. There was no group as defined by our stratification variables that had a low risk without radiotherapy. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that younger women have a low protective effect of conventional RT after sector resection. Older women benefit substantially. We caution that the age effect was seen in a subgroup analysis. Further search with conventional clinical variables for a low risk group that does not need RT does not seem fruitful.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2008. Vol. 26, no 8, 1247-52 p.
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-89227DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2007.12.7969ISI: 000254178300012PubMedID: 18250350OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-89227DiVA: diva2:159650
Available from: 2009-02-09 Created: 2009-02-09 Last updated: 2009-03-10Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed
By organisation
Endocrine Surgery
In the same journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 187 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link