uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Värderingskonflikter i praktiken: Hantering av ambivalens vid en neonatal intensivvårdsavdelning
Uppsala University, Humanistisk-samhällsvetenskapliga vetenskapsområdet, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Sociology.
2002 (Swedish)Doctoral thesis, monograph (Other academic)Alternative title
Dilemmas in practice : Handling of ambivalence in a neonatal intensive–care unit (English)
Abstract [en]

At neonatal intensive–care units conflicts between basic values, such as the one between saving life and minimizing suffering, are constantly present.

This study focuses on how the ambivalence thus created is dealt with in practice by medical staff, specifically focusing on the significance of contextual factors and how the organisation shapes the process of handling ambivalence.

Empirical data were collected by way of fieldwork at a neonatal intensive care unit in Sweden. Everyday care was studied by way of participant observations and a number of interviews with medical staff were performed

Handling of ambivalence is understood as a collective process in which all professional groups participate, although in different ways depending on their position in the division of labour. The whole working group is involved in creating the capacity for action that is necessary for critical decisions.

Ambivalence is primarily handled with the aid of knowledge. For knowledge to work as a tool for handling ambivalence, it must display certain qualities. The knowledge manifested must be convincing, appear reliable, unify, and be interpretable in normative terms. Nurses and doctors play different, and partly conflicting, roles in the process in which such knowledge is constructed. But in the end, to work, knowledge has to be accepted by both groups as the basis for a legitimate decision.

From the staff's perspective, the parents become key figures in the process of handling ambivalence. Three different ways in which parents can influence this process are identified.

Keywords: Ambivalence, Ideological dilemmas, Neonatal intensive–care, Parental involvement, Production of knowledge, Professional decisionmaking, Work organization.

Karin Götlind, Department of Sociology, Uppsala University, P.O. Box 821, SE-751 08 Uppsala, Sweden.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Stehag: Förlags ab Gondolin , 2002. , 264 p.
Keyword [en]
Sociology, Ambivalence, Ideological dilemmas, Neonatal intensive–care, Parental involvement, Production of knowledge, Professional decisionmaking, Work organization
Keyword [sv]
Sociologi
National Category
Sociology
Research subject
Sociology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-2890ISBN: 91-88821-34-X (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-2890DiVA: diva2:162145
Public defence
2002-11-29, Universitetshuset, St Olofsgatan, sal IX, Uppsala, 10:15
Opponent
Available from: 2002-11-06 Created: 2002-11-06Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

By organisation
Department of Sociology
Sociology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 450 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf