uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Power politics and peace policies: Intra-state conflict resolution in southern Africa
Uppsala University, Humanistisk-samhällsvetenskapliga vetenskapsområdet, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Peace and Conflict Research.
1998 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Why do some peace agreements after intra-state war fail, while others succeed? The dissertation focuses this question, with specific attention to intra-state wars in regional security complexes. The aim of this comparative study is theory building. Propositions, indicators and research questions are derived from a typology of explanatory variables. The research design is applied to eight conflict resolution processes in Southern Africa. An analysis of bivariate covariation, variable interaction and causal patterns in the cases is used to transform the typology into a preliminary theory.

Conflict resolution is a phased process: power-related factors-such as military, diplomatic and economic pressures-tend to bring about a peace agreement, while peace-related factors-such as genuine political will and increased trust between former belligerents-need to be added for the agreement to hold. While there are different paths to conflict resolution, the study identifies common causal patterns. It takes more to end a war, than to start one. A positive interaction between several variables at different levels of analysis was needed to produce a 'No War'-outcome. Specifically, interaction between experiential learning, the regional conflict dynamic, military support, leadership consolidation aspects and third party behaviour is found to have a causal impact on the dependent variable.

The attitudes of primary parties to mechanisms for distribution of political power after a war is more important than the specific nature, such as 'power sharing', of the political mechanism. If parties opt for a mechanism they can live with if they lose by it, peace is more likely to be durable. If they seek a mechanism that will maximize their advantage if they win by it, then the likelihood of a return to war increases. This underlines the role of experiential learning and political will for durable resolution of intra-state conflicts.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis , 1998. , 199 p.
Report / Department of Peace and Conflict Research, ISSN 0566-8808 ; 50
Keyword [en]
Peace and conflict research, conflict resolution, intrastate (civil) war, peace agreement, regional security complex, policy change, Southern Africa
Keyword [sv]
Freds- och konfliktforskning
National Category
Social Sciences Interdisciplinary
Research subject
Peace and Conflict Research
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-39ISBN: 91-506-1311-1OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-39DiVA: diva2:163825
Public defence
1998-11-16, Room IX, University Building, Uppsala, Uppsala, 08:30
Available from: 1998-10-26 Created: 1998-10-26Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

By organisation
Department of Peace and Conflict Research
Social Sciences Interdisciplinary

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 1144 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link