uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Outcome and risk factors after aortic valve interventions
Uppsala University, Medicinska vetenskapsområdet, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgical Sciences.
1999 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

In the present study the long-term survival and morbidity and the associated risk factors after aortic valve replacement (AVR) and after aortic balloon valvuloplasty were evaluated. In a cohort of 2,359 consecutive patients undergoing primary aortic valve replacement, the early mortality was 5.6%. The late observed 10-year survival was 63%, whereas the late relative survival, i.e. the survival in the study population compared to a background population, was 84%. Independent risk factors associated with late relative survival were advanced NYHA class (relative hazard [RH] 2.0), atrial fibrillation (RH 1.8) and pure aortic regurgitation (RH 1.5). High age was a risk factor for observed mortality, but not for excess mortality.

A series of 424 patients were enrolled in a prospective study after AVR with a mechanical prosthesis. During a median follow-up of 10 years, 583 morbid events were recorded in 57% of the patients. The incidence of cerebral thromboembolism expressed as linearised rate was 4.4% per patient-year, and the corresponding figure for haemorrhage was 8.5%. One-fifth of the study population experienced repeated episodes of thromboembolism and/or haemorrhage. Both haemorrhage and thromboembolism prior to surgery were strong risk factors for such respective events after AVR, and when these events occurred after surgery the risk for subsequent events was even stronger.

Balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) was attempted in a series of 64 elderly patients with aortic stenosis causing severe disability. This intervention resulted in a short-term improvement of symptoms. The 3-year survival afher BAV was 37%, which was unfavourable in comparison with the corresponding result, 77%, in a control group of patients after AVR. Thus, BAV should not be regarded as an alternative to AVR.

In the present study, different categories of patients who had undergone AVR were found to have an increased risk for death and morbid events. The future management of such patients needs to be improved in order to optimise the long-term outcome for the total population undergoing AVR.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis , 1999. , 75 p.
Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Medicine, ISSN 0282-7476 ; 880
Keyword [en]
Surgery, aortic valve replacement, mechanical valve prosthesis, relative survival, morbidity, recurrent events, balloon aortic valvuloplasty, long-term follow-up
Keyword [sv]
National Category
Research subject
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-395ISBN: 91-554-4590-XOAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-395DiVA: diva2:163949
Public defence
1999-12-07, Thoraxklinikens föreläsningssal, Akademiska sjukhuset, ingång 40, Uppsala, 13:15
Available from: 1999-11-16 Created: 1999-11-16Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text
Buy this publication >>

By organisation
Department of Surgical Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 65 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link