Logo: to the web site of Uppsala University

uu.sePublications from Uppsala University
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Comparison of unfolding methods for the inference of runaway electron energy distribution from gamma-ray spectroscopic measurements
Univ Milano Bicocca, Dipartimento Fis G Occhialini, Piazza Sci 3, I-20126 Milan, Italy..
CNR, Ist Sci & Tecnol Plasmi, Via R Cozzi 53, I-20126 Milan, Italy..
Univ Milano Bicocca, Dipartimento Fis G Occhialini, Piazza Sci 3, I-20126 Milan, Italy.;CNR, Ist Sci & Tecnol Plasmi, Via R Cozzi 53, I-20126 Milan, Italy..
Univ Milano Bicocca, Dipartimento Fis G Occhialini, Piazza Sci 3, I-20126 Milan, Italy.;CNR, Ist Sci & Tecnol Plasmi, Via R Cozzi 53, I-20126 Milan, Italy..
Show others and affiliations
2021 (English)In: Journal of Instrumentation, E-ISSN 1748-0221, Vol. 16, no 12, article id C12005Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Unfolding techniques are employed to reconstruct the 1D energy distribution of runaway electrons from Bremsstrahlung hard X-ray spectrum emitted during plasma disruptions in tokamaks. Here we compare four inversion methods: truncated singular value decomposition, which is a linear algebra technique, maximum likelihood expectation maximization, which is an iterative method, and Tikhonov regularization applied to chi(2) and Poisson statistics, which are two minimization approaches. The reconstruction fidelity and the capability of estimating cumulative statistics, such as the mean and maximum energy, have been assessed on both synthetic and experimental spectra. The effect of measurements limitations, such as the low energy cut and few number of counts, on the final reconstruction has also been studied. We find that the iterative method performs best as it better describes the statistics of the experimental data and is more robust to noise in the recorded spectrum.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
IOP Publishing Institute of Physics Publishing (IOPP), 2021. Vol. 16, no 12, article id C12005
Keywords [en]
Nuclear instruments and methods for hot plasma diagnostics, Plasma diagnostics - interferometry, spectroscopy and imaging, Analysis and statistical methods, Plasma diagnostics - charged-particle spectroscopy
National Category
Subatomic Physics Fusion, Plasma and Space Physics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-469749DOI: 10.1088/1748-0221/16/12/C12005ISI: 000758055400006OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-469749DiVA, id: diva2:1644852
Available from: 2022-03-15 Created: 2022-03-15 Last updated: 2025-02-14Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records

Eriksson, Jacob

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Eriksson, Jacob
By organisation
Applied Nuclear Physics
In the same journal
Journal of Instrumentation
Subatomic PhysicsFusion, Plasma and Space Physics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 20 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf