Logo: to the web site of Uppsala University

uu.sePublications from Uppsala University
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Was the EU Successful in Making the Ambitions of the 2020 Climate and Energy Package a Reality: A Case Study on Environmental Regime Effectiveness.
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Government.
2022 (English)Independent thesis Advanced level (degree of Master (Two Years)), 20 credits / 30 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

To mitigate the anthropogenic effects of climate change, the EU proposed and implemented the 2020 climate and energy package, which sets out three collective targets to be achieved by 2020: (1) a cut of at least 20% in greenhouse gas emissions compared to 1990 levels, (2) raising the share of renewable energy in the EU to at least 20%, (3) a 20% improvement in energy efficiency. Additionally, the package includes individual effort-sharing targets for memberstates to be achieved in this time. This thesis investigates how successful the EU was in making these targets a reality by 2020. It does so by evaluating the 2020 climate and energy package as a case study of international environmental regime effectiveness, focusing on compliance and goal attainment as key factors for effectiveness. In addition to answering this empirical puzzle, this thesis also investigates to what extent variation in compliance and goal attainment are correlated to member-states climate policy ambitions and aspects of state capacity. The results show that the EU has been successful in its collective effort to achieve its self-imposed targets, but it remains a puzzle to what extent the success of the energy targets can be attributed to theeffects of the COVID-19 pandemic. Secondly, the analysis shows that contrary to expectations of the literature government effectiveness has a negative effect on the compliance score of member-states, while member-states climate policy ambitions have a positive effect. This shows that differences in state capacity within the EU are not necessarily the decisive factor for compliance with EU environmental policy, but rather the political will of the member states.Additionally, this work has demonstrated the importance of further investigating whether the targets to which member-states have committed have been appropriately ambitious chosen.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2022. , p. 53
Keywords [en]
Climate change, European Union, environmental regimes, effectiveness, compliance, goal attainment, environmental politics
National Category
Political Science
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-470011OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-470011DiVA, id: diva2:1645470
Subject / course
Political Science
Educational program
Master Programme in Political Science
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2022-03-18 Created: 2022-03-17 Last updated: 2022-03-18Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

By organisation
Department of Government
Political Science

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 271 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf