Logo: to the web site of Uppsala University

uu.sePublications from Uppsala University
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Is the climate change mitigation effect of enhanced silicate weathering governed by biological processes?
Univ Antwerp, Biol Dept, Plants & Ecosyst PLECO, Univ Pl 1, B-2610 Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9812-5837
Univ Paris Saclay, LSCE IPSL, CEA CNRS UVSQ, Gif Sur Yvette, France.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9246-9671
Wageningen Univ & Res, Environm Sci, Soil Chem & Chem Soil Qual, Wageningen, Netherlands.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3980-1043
Univ Hamburg, Ctr Earth Syst Res & Sustainabil, Inst Geol, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1878-9321
Show others and affiliations
2022 (English)In: Global Change Biology, ISSN 1354-1013, E-ISSN 1365-2486, Vol. 28, no 3, p. 711-726Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

A number of negative emission technologies (NETs) have been proposed to actively remove CO2 from the atmosphere, with enhanced silicate weathering (ESW) as a relatively new NET with considerable climate change mitigation potential. Models calibrated to ESW rates in lab experiments estimate the global potential for inorganic carbon sequestration by ESW at about 0.5-5 Gt CO2 year(-1), suggesting ESW could be an important component of the future NETs mix. In real soils, however, weathering rates may differ strongly from lab conditions. Research on natural weathering has shown that biota such as plants, microbes, and macro-invertebrates can strongly affect weathering rates, but biotic effects were excluded from most ESW lab assessments. Moreover, ESW may alter soil organic carbon sequestration and greenhouse gas emissions by influencing physicochemical and biological processes, which holds the potential to perpetuate even larger negative emissions. Here, we argue that it is likely that the climate change mitigation effect of ESW will be governed by biological processes, emphasizing the need to put these processes on the agenda of this emerging research field.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
WILEY John Wiley & Sons, 2022. Vol. 28, no 3, p. 711-726
Keywords [en]
carbon sequestration, enhanced weathering, greenhouse gas emissions, negative emissions, soil biota
National Category
Climate Science
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-469866DOI: 10.1111/gcb.15993ISI: 000720520600001PubMedID: 34773318OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-469866DiVA, id: diva2:1645663
Funder
European Commission, CGL2016-79835-PAvailable from: 2022-03-18 Created: 2022-03-18 Last updated: 2025-02-07Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcb.15993

Authority records

Neubeck, Anna

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Vicca, SaraGoll, Daniel S.Hagens, MathildeHartmann, JensJanssens, Ivan A.Neubeck, AnnaPenuelas, JosepPoblador, SilviaVienne, Arthur
By organisation
Palaeobiology
In the same journal
Global Change Biology
Climate Science

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 54 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf