Logo: to the web site of Uppsala University

uu.sePublications from Uppsala University
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
5-Year Outcomes of PCI Guided by Measurement of Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio Versus Fractional Flow Reserve
Lund Univ, Skane Univ Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Clin Sci, S-22141 Lund, Sweden..
Lund Univ, Skane Univ Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Clin Sci, S-22141 Lund, Sweden..
Lund Univ, Skane Univ Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Clin Sci, S-22141 Lund, Sweden..
Aarhus Univ Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Skejby, Denmark..
Show others and affiliations
2022 (English)In: Journal of the American College of Cardiology, ISSN 0735-1097, E-ISSN 1558-3597, Vol. 79, no 10, p. 965-974Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND Instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) is a coronary physiology index used to assess the severity of coronary artery stenosis to guide revascularization. iFR has previously demonstrated noninferior short-term outcome compared to fractional flow reserve (FFR), but data on longer-term outcome have been lacking. OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to investigate the prespecified 5-year follow-up of the primary composite outcome of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, and unplanned revascularization of the iFR-SWEDEHEART trial comparing iFR vs FFR in patients with chronic and acute coronary syndromes. METHODS iFR-SWEDEHEART was a multicenter, controlled, open-label, registry-based randomized clinical trial using the Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry for enrollment. A total of 2,037 patients were randomized to undergo revascularization guided by iFR or FFR. RESULTS No patients were lost to follow-up. At 5 years, the rate of the primary composite endpoint was 21.5% in the iFR group and 19.9% in the FFR group (HR: 1.09; 95% CI: 0.90-1.33). The rates of all-cause death (9.4% vs 7.9%; HR: 1.20; 95% CI: 0.89-1.62), nonfatal myocardial infarction (5.7% vs 5.8%; HR: 1.00; 95% CI: 0.70-1.44), and unplanned revascularization (11.6% vs 11.3%; HR: 1.02; 95% CI: 0.79-1.32) were also not different between the 2 groups. The outcomes were consistent across prespecified subgroups. CONCLUSIONS In patients with chronic or acute coronary syndromes, an iFR-guided revascularization strategy was associated with no difference in the 5-year composite outcome of death, myocardial infarction, and unplanned revascularization compared with an FFR-guided revascularization strategy. (Evaluation of iFR vs FFR in Stable Angina or Acute Coronary Syndrome [iFR SWEDEHEART]; NCT02166736) (J Am Coll Cardiol 2022;79:965-974) (c) 2022 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier BV Elsevier, 2022. Vol. 79, no 10, p. 965-974
Keywords [en]
coronary physiology, fractional flow reserve, instantaneous wave-free ratio, percutaneous coronary intervention
National Category
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Disease
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-470578DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.12.030ISI: 000766654300005PubMedID: 35272801OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-470578DiVA, id: diva2:1647345
Available from: 2022-03-25 Created: 2022-03-25 Last updated: 2025-02-10Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records

James, Stefan

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
James, Stefan
By organisation
Cardiology
In the same journal
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Disease

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 45 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf