Logo: to the web site of Uppsala University

uu.sePublications from Uppsala University
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with Degenerative Spondylolisthesis Treated with Decompression Alone. A Cohort of 346 Patients at a Large Spine Unit. Clinical Outcome, Complications and Subsequent Surgery
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgical Sciences, Orthopaedics. Stockholm Spine Ctr, Lowenstroms Vag 1, S-19489 Upplands Väsby, Sweden..
Stockholm Spine Ctr, Lowenstroms Vag 1, S-19489 Upplands Väsby, Sweden..
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgical Sciences, Orthopaedics. Uppsala Univ Hosp, Dept Orthopaed, Spine Surg Unit, Uppsala, Sweden..
2022 (English)In: Spine, ISSN 0362-2436, E-ISSN 1528-1159, Vol. 47, no 6, p. 470-475Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Study Design. Cohort study. Objective. To study the clinical outcome, complications and subsequent surgery rate of DA for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) with DS. Summary of Background Data. There is still no consensus regarding the treatment approach for LSS with DS. Methods. We performed a retrospectively designed cohort study on prospectively collected data from a single high productive spine surgical center. Results from the Swedish Spine Registry and a local register for complications were used for the analyses. Patients with LSS and DS (>3 mm) who underwent DA during January 2012 to August 2017 were included. Patient reported outcome measures at baseline and 2 years after surgery were analyzed. Complications within 30 days of surgery and all subsequent surgery in the lumbar spine were registered. Results. We identified and included 346 patients with completed 2-year follow-up registration. At 2-year follow-up there was a significant improvement in all outcome measures. The global assessment success rate for back and leg pain was 68.3% and 67.6% respectively. Forty-one patients had at least 1 intra- or postoperative complication (11.9%). Nine patients (2.6%), underwent subsequent surgery within 2 years of the primary surgery whereof 2 underwent fusion. During the whole period of data collection, that is, as of June 2020, 28 patients had undergone subsequent surgery (8.1%) whereas 8 of them had had 2 surgeries. Fifteen patients underwent fusion. Conclusion. DA provides good clinical outcome at 2-year follow-up in patients with LSS and DS with low rate of intra- and postoperative complications and subsequent surgery. Our data supports the evidence that DA is effective and safe for LSS with DS.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) Wolters Kluwer, 2022. Vol. 47, no 6, p. 470-475
Keywords [en]
clinical outcome, cohort study, complications, decompression alone, decompression with fusion, degenerative spondylolisthesis, lumbar degeneration, lumbar spinal stenosis, spine, subsequent surgery
National Category
Orthopaedics Surgery
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-470542DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004291ISI: 000760969900011PubMedID: 35213524OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-470542DiVA, id: diva2:1647999
Available from: 2022-03-29 Created: 2022-03-29 Last updated: 2024-12-03Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. On the Diagnosis and Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
Open this publication in new window or tab >>On the Diagnosis and Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
2023 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is the most common indication for spinal surgery. The aging global population is increasing the demand for strategies that promote physical activity among the elderly. As the prevalence of LSS rises, the condition gains constantly demographic and socioeconomic attention. Until recently, there has been no clear consensus regarding LSS treatment. Further, using electrodiagnostic examinations (EDX) as predictive tools to identify surgical candidates, could lead to a more tailored medical approach. Methodological issues in previous studies have left some questions unanswered. The necessity of extensive surgery for LSS remains a topic of debate among spinal surgeons, which this work addressed by analyzing data from 723 patients. 

Parts of the work aimed to compare surgery and structured non-surgical treatment for LSS (Paper I, II, III). Furthermore, it aimed to investigate, by means of EDX, whether the degree of neurological affection correlates to the surgical outcome of LSS (Paper I, II). Additionally, this work evaluated the radiological outcome for surgical vs non-surgical treatment for LSS in terms of sagittal balance parameters (Paper III, V). Finally, parts of this thesis aimed to confirm findings from previous studies regarding DA and DF for LSS with DS (Paper IV, V). 

The current thesis is based on two randomized controlled trials and a cohort study: the Uppsala Spinal Stenosis Trial, the Swedish Spinal Stenosis Study, and the Cohort Study on LSS with DS. Patient reported outcome measures from the Swedish National Quality Registry for Spine Surgery (Swespine) were used to collect follow-up data. 

We concluded that at six months, surgery with decompression leads to superior clinical outcome, compared to structured physical therapy. The improvement is not affected by delay of surgery (Paper II). EDX does not add predictive value when assessing the patients for eligibility before surgery (Paper II). DA improves the spinal sagittal balance, regardless of preoperative DS (Paper III) and provides good two-year clinical outcome in LSS with DS with low rate of complications, and low need for subsequent surgery (Paper IV). New radiological stenosis was less common two years after DA than after DF, in LSS with or without preoperative DS (Paper V).

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis, 2023. p. 73
Series
Digital Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Medicine, ISSN 1651-6206 ; 1972
Keywords
lumbar spinal stenosis, spine surgery, decompression, fusion, sagittal balance, electrodiagnosis, neurophysiology
National Category
Orthopaedics
Research subject
Orthopaedics; Neurology; Radiology
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-504392 (URN)978-91-513-1887-5 (ISBN)
Public defence
2023-10-20, H:son Holmdahlsalen, Uppsala University Hospital, Entrance 100/101, Uppsala, 09:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2023-09-27 Created: 2023-08-31 Last updated: 2023-09-27

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records

Pazarlis, Konstantinos A.Försth, Peter

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Pazarlis, Konstantinos A.Försth, Peter
By organisation
Orthopaedics
In the same journal
Spine
OrthopaedicsSurgery

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 89 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf