uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Återpantsättning enligt svensk rätt: Om pantsättning av pant och panträtt
Uppsala University, Humanistisk-samhällsvetenskapliga vetenskapsområdet, Faculty of Law, Department of Law.
2004 (Swedish)Doctoral thesis, monograph (Other academic)Alternative title
Repledge under Swedish Law : On Pledging Collateral and Pledgee-rights (English)
Abstract [en]

The main purpose of this study is to analyse the concept of repledge (or sub-pledge, or, in a narrow sense, rehypothecation) under Swedish law.

A repledge typically occurs when B has received collateral from A under a pledge securing A’s obligations towards B, and B in his turn pledges that collateral (i.e. the pledged object) and/or his own rights as pledgee (“pledgee-rights”) to C as collateral for B’s obligations towards C. A repledge may be undertaken together with a pledge of B’s claim on A, or isolated from that claim. A will remain the owner of the collateral even after a repledge.

The main issues dealt with in this study are the following. 1) What is the object of the repledge – the collateral or B’s pledgee-rights? 2) Under what conditions, if any, may C refuse to release the collateral until he has received payment from either A or B? 3) What are the implications of the rule under Swedish law that B may not repledge on terms that are more severe than those under which A has pledged to B? 4) How is the repledge perfected, i.e. how are C’s (re)pledgee-rights secured against B’s creditors and against others than C to whom B may repledge the same collateral? 5) In which ways does an isolated repledge differ from a repledge that has been undertaken together with a pledge of B’s claim on A?

One significant conclusion is that it is of great importance for C to notify A of the repledge. Such a notification gives C a right to retain the collateral until payment has been received (and directs A’s payment to C, if B does not pay), and may also entail perfection of the repledge. However, many uncertainties still remain and there seems to be a need for clarifying legislation.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2004. , 534 p.
Keyword [en]
Private law, rehypothecation, repledge, subpledge, remortgage, submortgage, pledge, collateral, right of use
Keyword [sv]
Civilrätt, återpantsättning, frempantsætning, frempantsettelse, rediskontering, vidarepantsättning, återpantsätta, vidarepantsätta, rediskontera, borgenärsskydd, förfogandelegitimation, betalningslegitimation, mottagandelegitimation, säkerhetsöverlåtelse, godtrosförvärv, tredjemanspantsättning, pant, panträtt, sakrätt
Keyword [la]
pignus irregulare
National Category
Law (excluding Law and Society)
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-4372OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-4372DiVA: diva2:164862
Public defence
2004-06-09, Grotiussalen, Juridiska institutionen, Trädgårdsgatan 1, Uppsala, 14:15
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2004-05-19 Created: 2004-05-19Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

By organisation
Department of Law
Law (excluding Law and Society)

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 1149 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf