uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Rapid Emergency Medicine score: A new prognostic tool for in-hospital mortality in nonsurgical emergency department patients: Rapid Emergency Medicine Score
Uppsala University, Medicinska vetenskapsområdet, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Sciences.
2004 In: Journal of Internal Medicine, ISSN 0954-6820, Vol. 255, no 5, 579-587 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2004. Vol. 255, no 5, 579-587 p.
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-92286OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-92286DiVA: diva2:165306
Available from: 2004-10-29 Created: 2004-10-29Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Risk Prediction at the Emergency Department
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Risk Prediction at the Emergency Department
2004 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

The severity of illness was scored in a cohort of 11751 non-surgical patients presenting at the Emergency Department (ED) during 12 consecutive months and followed for 4.7 years. The scoring system Rapid Acute Physiology score (RAPS) (including blood pressure, respiratory rate, pulse rate and Glasgow coma scale) was calculated for all arrivals at the ED. The RAPS system was also additionally developed by including the peripheral oxygen saturation and patient age, resulting in the new Rapid Emergency Medicine Score, (REMS). REMS was superior to RAPS in predicting in-hospital mortality according to ROC-curve analysis. An increase of one point in the 26 point REMS scale was associated with an Odds ratio of 1.40 for in-hospital death (95% CI 1.36-1.45, p<0.0001). Similar results were obtained in the major patient groups (chest pain, stroke, coma, dyspnea and diabetes). The association between REMS and length of stay in hospital was modest. Charlson Co-morbidity Index could add prognostic information to REMS in a long-term (4.7 years), but not in a short-term perspective (3 and 7 days). REMS was shown to be as powerful a predictor of in-hospital mortality as the more complicated APACHE II. REMS at the ED could also predict long-term mortality (4.7 years) in the total cohort (Hazard ratio 1.26, p<0.0001).

REMS is a potentially useful prognostic tool for non-surgical patients at the ED, regarding both in-hospital and long-term mortality. It is less complicated to use than APACHE II and has equal predictive accuracy.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis, 2004. 63 p.
Series
Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Medicine, ISSN 0282-7476 ; 1383
Keyword
Medicine, scoring system, mortality, cohort, prospective, Emergency Department, Medicin
National Category
Dermatology and Venereal Diseases
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-4632 (URN)91-554-6070-4 (ISBN)
Public defence
2004-11-26, Sal X, Uppsala University, Uppsala, 13:15
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2004-10-29 Created: 2004-10-29Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

By organisation
Department of Medical Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 383 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf