uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
A Particular Consequentialism: Why Moral Particularism and Consequentialism Need Not Conflict
Uppsala University, Humanistisk-samhällsvetenskapliga vetenskapsområdet, Faculty of Arts, Department of Philosophy.
2003 In: Utilitas, ISSN 0953-8208, Vol. 15, no 2, 194-205 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2003. Vol. 15, no 2, 194-205 p.
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-92931OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-92931DiVA: diva2:166254
Available from: 2005-04-27 Created: 2005-04-27Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Axiological Investigations
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Axiological Investigations
2005 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

The subject of this thesis is formal axiology, i.e., the discipline that deals with structural and conceptual questions about value. The main focus is on intrinsic or final value. The thesis consists of an introduction and six free-standing essays. The purpose of the introduction is to give a general background to the discussions in the essays. The introduction is divided into five sections. Section 1 outlines the subject matter and sketches the methodological framework. Section 2 discusses the supervenience of value, and how my use of that notion squares with the broader methodological framework. Section 3 defends the concept of intrinsic or final value. Section 4 discusses issues in value typology; particularly how intrinsic value relates to final value. Section 5 summarises the essays and provides some specific backgrounds to their respective themes.

The six essays are thematically divided into four categories: The first two deal with specific issues concerning analyses of value. Essay 1 is a comparative discussion of competing approaches in this area. Essay 2 discusses, and proposes a solution to, a significant problem for the so called ‘buck-passing’ analysis of value. Essay 3 discusses the ontological nature of the bearers of final value, and defends the view that they are particularised properties, or tropes. Essay 4 defends conditionalism about final value, i.e., the idea that final value may vary according to context. The last two essays focus on some implications of the formal axiological discussion for normative theory: Essay 5 discusses the charge that the buck-passing analysis prematurely resolves the debate between consequentialism and deontology; essay 6 suggests that conditionalism makes possible a reconciliation between consequentialism and moral particularism.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis, 2005. 73 p.
Series
Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Arts, ISSN 1102-2043 ; 4
Keyword
Practical philosophy, axiology, buck-passing, conditionalism, final value, G.E. Moore, intrinsic goodness, intrinsicalism, supervenience, tropes, Praktisk filosofi
National Category
Philosophy
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-5751 (URN)91-554-6223-5 (ISBN)
Public defence
2005-05-19, Sal IV, Universitetshuset, Uppsala, 10:00
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2005-04-27 Created: 2005-04-27Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

By organisation
Department of Philosophy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 403 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf