uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
What matters most to prejudice: Big Five personality, social dominance orientation or right-wing authoritarianism?
Uppsala University, Humanistisk-samhällsvetenskapliga vetenskapsområdet, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Psychology.
2004 In: European Journal of Personality, Vol. 18, 463-482 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2004. Vol. 18, 463-482 p.
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-93026OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-93026DiVA: diva2:166377
Available from: 2005-04-22 Created: 2005-04-22Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Prejudice: The Interplay of Personality, Cognition, and Social Psychology
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Prejudice: The Interplay of Personality, Cognition, and Social Psychology
2005 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Three main theoretical approaches to the study of the causation of prejudice can be distinguished within psychological research. The cognitive approach suggests that prejudice is a function of cognitive processes where stereotypic information about social groups, stored in memory, is automatically activated and affects people’s judgements and behavior toward members of the target group. The personality approach suggests that prejudice is a function of people’s personality characteristics. Finally, the social psychological approach emphasizes people’s group membership and group identification as the as major source of causation.

Previous research has almost entirely focused on only one approach of causation at a time. The focus has also shifted periodically – with attention paid to one approach at each period of time. The present thesis is an attempt to integrate these approaches and suggests an integrative model where the relative contribution of each approach could be assessed. The underlying assumption is that all three approaches are meaningful and that prejudice is a complex phenomenon that is best explained by taking into account all approaches jointly.

Examining the cognitive approach, Paper I revealed that people are knowledgeable of the cultural stereotypes and that stereotypic information is automatically activated and affects people’s judgments. Paper II (and Paper III) supported the personality approach and revealed that prejudice is highly related to primary personality characteristics and, in line with a central idea in this approach, different types of prejudice (ethnic prejudice, sexism, homophobia, and prejudice toward disabled people) are highly correlated. The results of Paper III revealed the importance of group membership and group identification, supporting the social psychology approach.

The findings are discussed in relation to previous research and the necessity to integrate various approaches and disciplines to explain psychological phenomena in general and prejudice in particular. Also, implications of the findings for prejudice prevention are discussed.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis, 2005. 65 p.
Series
Digital Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Social Sciences, ISSN 1652-9030 ; 5
Keyword
Psychology, Prejudice, implicit prejudice, explicit prejudice, generalized prejudice, personality, Big-Five personality, social dominance orientation, right-wing authoritarianism, social psychology, group membership, group identification, cognition, stereotype knowledge, priming, stereotype activation, Psykologi
National Category
Psychology
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-5785 (URN)91-554-6244-8 (ISBN)
Public defence
2005-05-13, Room IX, Universitetshuset, Uppsala, 13:15
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2005-04-22 Created: 2005-04-22Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

By organisation
Department of Psychology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 397 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf