Logo: to the web site of Uppsala University

uu.sePublications from Uppsala University
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Variation in communication and family visiting policies in intensive care within and between countries during the Covid-19 pandemic: The COVISIT international survey
Metro North Hosp & Hlth Serv, Redcliffe Hosp, Intens Care Unit, Stafford, Qld, Australia.;Queensland Univ Technol, Brisbane, Qld, Australia.;Univ Queensland, Fac Med, Brisbane, Qld, Australia.
Univ Tripoli, Fac Med, Tripoli, Libya.
QIMR Berghofer Med Res Inst, Brisbane, Qld, Australia.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9430-2485
Univ Palermo, Dept Surg Oncol & Oral Sci DiChirOnS, Palermo, Italy.;Policlin Paolo Giaccone, Dept Anesthesia Intens Care & Emergency, Palermo, Italy.
Show others and affiliations
2022 (English)In: Journal of critical care, ISSN 0883-9441, E-ISSN 1557-8615, Vol. 71, article id 154050Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: During the COVID-19 pandemic, intensive care units (ICU) introduced restrictions to in-person family visiting to safeguard patients, healthcare personnel, and visitors.

Methods: We conducted a web-based survey (March-July 2021) investigating ICU visiting practices before the pandemic, at peak COVID-19 ICU admissions, and at the time of survey response. We sought data on visiting policies and communication modes including use of virtual visiting (videoconferencing).

Results: We obtained 667 valid responses representing ICUs in all continents. Before the pandemic, 20% (106/ 525) had unrestricted visiting hours; 6% (30/525) did not allow in-person visiting. At peak, 84% (558/667) did not allow in-person visiting for patients with COVID-19; 66% for patients without COVID-19. This proportion had decreased to 55% (369/667) at time of survey reporting. A government mandate to restrict hospital visiting was reported by 53% (354/646). Most ICUs (55%, 353/615) used regular telephone updates; 50% (306/667) used telephone for formal meetings and discussions regarding prognosis or end-of-life. Virtual visiting was available in 63% (418/667) at time of survey.

Conclusions: Highly restrictive visiting policies were introduced at the initial pandemic peaks, were subsequently liberalized, but without returning to pre-pandemic practices. Telephone became the primary communication mode in most ICUs, supplemented with virtual visits. (c) 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier BV Elsevier, 2022. Vol. 71, article id 154050
Keywords [en]
Visiting, Restriction, Intensive care, Family, COVID-19
National Category
Health Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health Economy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-476813DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2022.154050ISI: 000797776900002PubMedID: 35525226OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-476813DiVA, id: diva2:1669100
Available from: 2022-06-14 Created: 2022-06-14 Last updated: 2024-01-15Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedArticle

Authority records

Pellegrini, Mariangela

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Ballard, EmmaPellegrini, Mariangela
By organisation
Hedenstierna laboratory
In the same journal
Journal of critical care
Health Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health Economy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 18 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf