Variation in communication and family visiting policies in intensive care within and between countries during the Covid-19 pandemic: The COVISIT international surveyHumanitas Res Hosp, Anaesthesia & Intens Care Units, Milan, Italy.;Humanitas Univ, Milan, Italy.
Sapporo City Univ, Sch Nursing, Dept Acute & Crit Care Nursing, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Hosp Gen Univ Castellon, Dept Intens Care, Castellon De La Plana, Spain.
Hosp Moinhos Vento, Intens Care Unit, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
CHR Orleans, Reanimat Hop Source, Med Intens, Orleans, France.
Univ Paris, Hop St Louis, Grp FAMIREA, Med Intens & Reanimat, Paris, France.
Queensland Univ Technol, Brisbane, Qld, Australia.;Royal Brisbane & Womens Hosp, Dept Intens Care Serv, Brisbane, Qld, Australia.
Queensland Univ Technol, Brisbane, Qld, Australia.
Guys & St Thomas NHS Fdn Trust, Kings Coll London, Dept Crit Care & Nephrol, London, England.
European Soc Intens Care Med, Div Sci Affairs, Res, Brussels, Belgium.
Ghent Univ Hosp, Dept Crit Care Med, Ghent, Belgium.;Univ Ghent, Div Internal Med & Pediat, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Ghent, Belgium.
Univ Calgary, OBrien Inst Publ Hlth, Psychiat, Dept Crit Care Med,Community Hlth Sci, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Albert Schweitzerlaan, Gelre Hosp, Dept Intens Care Med, Apeldoorn, Netherlands.
Hadassah Med Ctr, Intens Care Trauma, Jerusalem, Israel.
Kings Coll London, Florence Nightingale Fac Nursing Midwifery & Pall, London, England.;Guys & St Thomas NHS Fdn Trust, Crit Care & Lane Fox Clin Resp Physiol Res Ctr, London, England.
Show others and affiliations
2022 (English)In: Journal of critical care, ISSN 0883-9441, E-ISSN 1557-8615, Vol. 71, article id 154050Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]
Background: During the COVID-19 pandemic, intensive care units (ICU) introduced restrictions to in-person family visiting to safeguard patients, healthcare personnel, and visitors.
Methods: We conducted a web-based survey (March-July 2021) investigating ICU visiting practices before the pandemic, at peak COVID-19 ICU admissions, and at the time of survey response. We sought data on visiting policies and communication modes including use of virtual visiting (videoconferencing).
Results: We obtained 667 valid responses representing ICUs in all continents. Before the pandemic, 20% (106/ 525) had unrestricted visiting hours; 6% (30/525) did not allow in-person visiting. At peak, 84% (558/667) did not allow in-person visiting for patients with COVID-19; 66% for patients without COVID-19. This proportion had decreased to 55% (369/667) at time of survey reporting. A government mandate to restrict hospital visiting was reported by 53% (354/646). Most ICUs (55%, 353/615) used regular telephone updates; 50% (306/667) used telephone for formal meetings and discussions regarding prognosis or end-of-life. Virtual visiting was available in 63% (418/667) at time of survey.
Conclusions: Highly restrictive visiting policies were introduced at the initial pandemic peaks, were subsequently liberalized, but without returning to pre-pandemic practices. Telephone became the primary communication mode in most ICUs, supplemented with virtual visits. (c) 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier BV Elsevier, 2022. Vol. 71, article id 154050
Keywords [en]
Visiting, Restriction, Intensive care, Family, COVID-19
National Category
Health Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health Economy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-476813DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2022.154050ISI: 000797776900002PubMedID: 35525226OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-476813DiVA, id: diva2:1669100
2022-06-142022-06-142024-01-15Bibliographically approved