uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Påföljdskonkurrens - problem och principer
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Law, Department of Law.
2005 (Swedish)Doctoral thesis, monograph (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

This is a thesis in criminal law concerning concurrence of crimes and principles of sentencing multiple offenders. Concurrence of crimes occurs in situations where more than one rule (or the same rule several times) can be applied on a certain case. The fact that it is possible to apply the law more than once does not imply that this is also appropriate. When dealing with concurrence of punishment, it is always established that the offender is to be convicted of more than one crime. The main question is what principles should be used in sentencing multiple offenders. Traditionally a number of legislative models and principles have been used, which all are reflections of three principles, namely the principles of cumulation, absorption and asperation.

Depending on whether sentencing multiple offending arises on one occasion or on different occasions, distinct types of problems of concurrence occur. The special feature that distinguishes sentencing multiple offenders on different occasions is the time aspect. Under the condition that the previous sentence has not been fully implemented when the new criminality is committed, the court is obliged to—to various extents—take the previous sentence into account when deciding on the new sentence. Thus, the sentencing becomes iterative.

The overarching purpose of the thesis is to examine what principles underpin the regulation on sentencing multiple offenders and whether these principles are compatible with the general principles and the ideology of sentencing in Swedish law. A further purpose is to reconstruct the principles applied in iterative sentencing and to examine whether these principles correspond with the general principles of sentencing. My conclusion is that the Criminal Code Ch. 34 rests on partly different rationales and values than the ones governing the Swedish sentencing policy. Hereby, the regulation causes a number of practical problems. The main proposal is that the concurrence doctrine should be based on the same rationales and ideological foundation as the regulation of sentencing in general.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Uppsala: Iustus Förlag AB , 2005. , 585 p.
Skrifter från Juridiska fakulteten i Uppsala, ISSN 0282-2040 ; 99
Keyword [en]
Criminal law
Keyword [sv]
Straffrätt, Straffrätt, påföljdsbestämning, konkurrens, principer
National Category
Law (excluding Law and Society)
Research subject
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-6084ISBN: 91-7678-602-1OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-6084DiVA: diva2:167264
Public defence
2005-11-12, Grotiussalen, Juridicum, Trädgårdsgatan 1, Uppsala, 10:00 (English)
Available from: 2009-04-21 Created: 2006-03-19 Last updated: 2009-04-21Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

By organisation
Department of Law
Law (excluding Law and Society)

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 615 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link