Logo: to the web site of Uppsala University

uu.sePublications from Uppsala University
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Removal of erythrocytes from sperm samples, comparison between two different methods.
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Cell Biology.
2022 (English)Independent thesis Basic level (degree of Bachelor), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

Azoospermia is defined as the absence of spermatozoa in ejaculate, and it is a condition that about 10 – 15 % of the men that seeks treatment for infertility are diagnosed with. Some types of azoospermia can be amended through surgery where sperm are retrieved directly from the testicles or the epididymis. This brings the risk of a large number of erythrocytes in the sample which obstruct the visualisation of the spermatozoa and result in long search times for the embryologist.

The aim of this study was to evaluate two different kits for separation of erytrocyter from sperm samples in terms of efficiency and gentleness towards the spermatozoa. 

The kits being evaluated were MACSxpress® Erythrocyte Depletion Kit and Red Blood Cell Lysis Solution (10×). A third kit, Dead Cell Removal Kit, was used to estimate the number of spermatozoa left alive after the analysis. Leftover material from preparated sperm samples (n=21) and unpreparated sperm samples (n=3) were mixed with blood and analysed using the kits. The number of erythrocytes and spermatozoa were counted before, after and compared between the kits using a Makler chamber.

Both kits successfully removed erythrocytes from the sample although MACSxpress® Erythrocyte Depletion Kit was more effective. Both kits were also gentle towards the spermatozoa since there were no significant difference between the two kits in number of spermatozoa still alive. However further study is needed to determine whether one of the kits are preferable to the other.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2022. , p. 24
Keywords [en]
Miltenyi Biotec, depletion kit, lysis solution, dead cell removal, azoospermia
National Category
Gynaecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-478180OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-478180DiVA, id: diva2:1674347
External cooperation
Reproduktionscentrum, Akademiska sjukhuset
Educational program
Biomedical Laboratory Science Programme
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2022-06-22 Created: 2022-06-21 Last updated: 2025-02-11Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

By organisation
Department of Medical Cell Biology
Gynaecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 245 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf