Logo: to the web site of Uppsala University

uu.sePublications from Uppsala University
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Examining patient and professional perspectives in the UK for gene therapy in haemophilia
Pfizer Ltd. Tadworth UK.
HCD Economics Daresbury UK.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2014-3415
Katharine Dormandy Haemophilia and Thrombosis Centre Royal Free Hospital London UK.
HCD Economics Daresbury UK;Faculty of Health and Social Care University of Chester Chester UK.
Show others and affiliations
2022 (English)In: Haemophilia, ISSN 1351-8216, E-ISSN 1365-2516, Vol. 28, no 4, p. 588-609Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Introduction: With the development of gene therapy for people with haemophilia (PWH), it is important to understand how people impacted by haemophilia (PIH) and clinicians prioritise haemophilia treatment attributes to support informed treatment decisions.

Objective: To examine the treatment attribute preferences of PIH and clinical experts in the United Kingdom (UK) and to develop a profile of gene therapy characteristics fit for use in future discrete choice experiments (DCEs).

Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with PIH (n = 14) and clinical experts (n = 6) who ranked pre-defined treatment attributes by importance. Framework analysis was conducted to identify key themes and treatment attributes; points were allocated based on the rankings. Synthesis of results by a multidisciplinary group informed development of a profile of gene therapy characteristics for use in future research.

Results: Key themes identified by PIH and clinical experts included patient relevant features and the importance of ‘informed decision making'. The six top-ranked treatment attributes were ‘effect on factor level’ (79 points), ‘uncertainty regarding long-term risks’ (57 points), ‘impact on daily life’ (41 points), ‘frequency of monitoring’ (33 points), ‘impact on ability to participate in physical activity’ (29 points), and ‘uncertainty regarding long-term benefits’ (28 points). The final treatment characteristics were categorised as therapeutic option, treatment effectiveness, safety concerns, impact on self-management and quality of life (role limitations).

Conclusion: We identified several gene therapy characteristics important to PIH and clinicians in the UK. These characteristics will be used in a future DCE to further investigate patient preferences for gene therapy.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2022. Vol. 28, no 4, p. 588-609
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-480801DOI: 10.1111/hae.14572OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-480801DiVA, id: diva2:1683996
Projects
IMI-PREFERAvailable from: 2022-07-20 Created: 2022-07-20 Last updated: 2022-10-11

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Morgan, Georgevan Overbeeke, ElineMartin, AntonyWinburn, Ian
In the same journal
Haemophilia
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 267 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf