uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Validation and application of an instrument for measuring patient relatives’ perception of quality of geriatric care
Uppsala University, Medicinska vetenskapsområdet, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences.
2003 In: International Journal for Quality in Health Care, Vol. 15, no 3, 197-206 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2003. Vol. 15, no 3, 197-206 p.
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-95253OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-95253DiVA: diva2:169395
Available from: 2006-12-12 Created: 2006-12-12Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Nursing Staff Competence, Psychosocial Work Environment and Quality of Elderly Care: Impact of an Educational Intervention
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Nursing Staff Competence, Psychosocial Work Environment and Quality of Elderly Care: Impact of an Educational Intervention
2006 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Alternative title[sv]
Effekter av en utbildningsintervention på personalens kompetens, psykosociala arbetsmiljö samt vårdkvalitet inom kommunal äldreomsorg
Abstract [en]

Insufficient competence among nursing staff is a major concern in elderly care worldwide as the healthcare needs of the elderly become increasingly complex. In previous research, insufficient competence has been associated with work dissatisfaction and stress among elderly care nurses, and with lower quality of care. This thesis describes the development, implementation and evaluation of an educational intervention for nursing staff in elderly care. In a prospective, controlled study, evaluation of the educational toolbox was based on nursing staff ratings of their competence and psychosocial work environment, as well as on care recipients’ and family relatives’ ratings of the quality of elderly care.

Paper I validated a questionnaire measuring care recipient relatives’ perceptions of quality of care. Paper II compared self-rated competence, work strain, stress, and work satisfaction between staff working in home-based care and nursing homes. Papers III and IV evaluated the impact of the educational intervention on staff perceptions of their competence and psychosocial work environment (Paper III) and on care recipients’ and relatives’ perceptions of the quality of care (Paper IV).

The results showed that staff ratings of their competence and psychosocial work environment, including work satisfaction and work stress, improved significantly over time in the intervention municipality, compared to the reference group. Neither care recipients’ nor relatives’ ratings of the quality of care changed significantly over time in the intervention organization. Furthermore, there were no significant interaction effects over time between the intervention and reference groups for quality ratings. These results indicate that an educational toolbox that can be used according to local workplace needs may be an effective and sustainable intervention for improving staff competence and the psychosocial work environment. However, further studies are needed to investigate whether, and under what conditions, improved staff competence and work environment have an impact on quality of care.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis, 2006. 83 p.
Series
Digital Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Medicine, ISSN 1651-6206 ; 210
Keyword
Social medicine, elderly care, home care, nursing home, nursing staff, care recipient, family members, quality of care, the psychosocial work environment, competence development, Socialmedicin
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-7383 (URN)91-554-6750-4 (ISBN)
Public defence
2007-01-11, Rudbecksalen, Rudbeck laboratoriet, Dag Hammarskjölds väg 20, Uppsala, 09:15
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2006-12-12 Created: 2006-12-12Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

By organisation
Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 430 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf