Logo: to the web site of Uppsala University

uu.sePublications from Uppsala University
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
An International Registry of Peritoneal Carcinomatosis from Appendiceal Goblet Cell Carcinoma Treated with Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy
Univ Montreal, Dept Surg Oncol, CHU Montreal, 1000 St Denis, Montreal, PQ H2X 0C1, Canada.;Univ Lyon, Hosp Civils Lyon, Dept Surg Oncol, CHU Lyon Sud, Lyon, France.
Univ Lyon, Hosp Civils Lyon, Dept Surg Oncol, CHU Lyon Sud, Lyon, France.;Lyon 1 Univ, EMR 37 38, Lyon, France.
Jean Mermoz Hosp, Dept Digest Surg, Lyon, France.
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgical Sciences, Upper Abdominal Surgery.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3474-9450
Show others and affiliations
2022 (English)In: World Journal of Surgery, ISSN 0364-2313, E-ISSN 1432-2323, Vol. 46, no 6, p. 1336-1343Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Purpose Peritoneal carcinomatosis from appendiceal goblet cell carcinoma (A-GCC) is a rare and aggressive form of appendiceal tumor. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intra peritoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) was reported as an interesting alternative regarding survival compared to surgery without HIPEC and/or systemic chemotherapy. Our aim was to evaluate the impact of CRS and HIPEC for patients presenting A-GCC through an international registry.

Methods A prospective multicenter international database was retrospectively searched to identify all patients with A-GCC tumor and peritoneal metastases who underwent CRS and HIPEC through the Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International (PSOGI). The post-operative complications, long-term results, and principal prognostic factors were analyzed.

Results The analysis included 83 patients. After a median follow-up of 47 months, the median overall survival (OS) was 34.6 months. The 3- and 5-year OS was 48.5% and 35.7%, respectively. Patients who underwent complete macroscopic CRS had a significantly better survival than those treated with incomplete CRS. The 5-year OS was 44% and 0% for patients who underwent complete, and incomplete CRS, respectively (HR 9.65, p < 0.001). Lymph node involvement and preoperative chemotherapy were also predictive of a worse prognosis. There were 3 postoperative deaths, and 30% of the patients had major complications.

Conclusion CRS and HIPEC may increase long-term survival in selected patients with peritoneal metastases of A-GCC origin, especially when complete CRS is achieved. Ideally, randomized control trials or more retrospective data are needed to confirm CRS and HIPEC as the gold standard in this pathology.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer, 2022. Vol. 46, no 6, p. 1336-1343
National Category
Surgery
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-485884DOI: 10.1007/s00268-022-06498-wISI: 000768638700001PubMedID: 35286418OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-485884DiVA, id: diva2:1699838
Available from: 2022-09-29 Created: 2022-09-29 Last updated: 2022-09-29Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedhttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00268-022-06498-w#rightslink

Authority records

Cashin, Peter

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Cashin, PeterCeelen, Wim
By organisation
Upper Abdominal Surgery
In the same journal
World Journal of Surgery
Surgery

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 30 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf