uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Belief Coalition Formation and Stability in Swedish Nuclear Energy Policy, 1970-1991
In: An Advocacy Coalition Lens on Environmental PolicyChapter in book (Other academic) In progress
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-95700OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-95700DiVA: diva2:170014
Available from: 2007-04-13 Created: 2007-04-13Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Crisis and Policy Reformcraft: Advocacy Coalitions and Crisis-induced Change in Swedish Nuclear Energy Policy
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Crisis and Policy Reformcraft: Advocacy Coalitions and Crisis-induced Change in Swedish Nuclear Energy Policy
2007 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

This dissertation consists of three interrelated essays examining the role of crisis events in Swedish nuclear energy policymaking. The study takes stock of the idea of ‘crisis exceptionalism’ raised in the literature, which postulates that crisis events provide openings for major policy change. In an effort to explain crisis-induced outcomes in Swedish nuclear energy policy, each essay explores and develops theoretical assumptions derived from the Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF). The introduction discusses the ACF and other theoretical perspectives accentuating the role of crisis in policymaking and identifies three explanations for crisis-induced policy outcomes: minority coalition mobilization, learning, and strategic action. Essay I analyzes the nature and development of the Swedish nuclear energy subsystem. The results contradict the ACF assumption that corporatist systems nurture narrow subsystems and small advocacy coalitions, but corroborate the assumption that advocacy coalitions remain stable over time. While this analysis identifies temporary openings in policymaking venues and in the advocacy coalition structure, it is argued that these developments did not affect crisis policymaking. Essay II seeks to explain the decision to initiate a referendum on nuclear power following the 1979 Three Mile Island accident. Internal government documents and other historical records indicate that strategic considerations superseded learning as the primary explanation in this case. Essay III conducts an in-depth examination of Swedish policymaking in the aftermath of the 1986 Chernobyl accident in an effort to explain the government’s decision not to accelerate the nuclear power phaseout. Recently disclosed government documents show that minority coalition mobilization was insufficient to explain this decision. In this case, rational learning and strategic action provided a better explanation. The main theoretical contribution derived from the three essays is to posit the intensity and breadth of political conflict, strategic action, and analogical reasoning as key factors affecting the propensity for crisis-induced policy change.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Uppsala: Statsvetenskapliga institutionen, 2007. x, 161 p.
Political science, Crisis, policy change, advocacy coalitions, Swedish nuclear energy policy, learning, strategic action, Statsvetenskap
National Category
Political Science
urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-7796 (URN)978-91-506-1928-7 (ISBN)
Public defence
2007-05-04, Brusewitzsalen, Statsvetenskapliga institutionen, Gamla Torget 6, Uppsala, 10:15
Available from: 2007-04-13 Created: 2007-04-13 Last updated: 2014-05-21Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 163 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link