Logo: to the web site of Uppsala University

uu.sePublications from Uppsala University
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Association of Rare APOE Missense Variants V236E and R251G With Risk of Alzheimer Disease
Stanford Univ, Dept Neurol & Neurol Sci, 290 Jane Stanford Way,E265, Palo Alto, CA 94305 USA.;Paris Brain Inst, Inst Cerveau, Paris, France.
Stanford Univ, Dept Neurol & Neurol Sci, 290 Jane Stanford Way,E265, Palo Alto, CA 94305 USA.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7748-9033
Univ Lille, Inst Pasteur Lille, U1167 RID AGE Facteurs Risque & Determinants Mol, CHU Lille,Inserm, Lille, France.
Univ Int Catalunya, Res Ctr, Inst Catala Neurociencies Aplicades, Barcelona, Spain.;Univ Int Catalunya, Inst Catala Neurociencies Aplicades, Memory Clin Fundacio ACE, Barcelona, Spain.;Inst Salud Carlos III, Networking Res Ctr Neurodegenerat Dis CIBERNED, Madrid, Spain.
Show others and affiliations
2022 (English)In: JAMA Neurology, ISSN 2168-6149, E-ISSN 2168-6157, Vol. 79, no 7, p. 652-663Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Importance The APOE epsilon 2 and APOE epsilon 4 alleles are the strongest protective and risk-increasing, respectively, genetic variants for late-onset Alzheimer disease (AD). However, the mechanisms linking APOE to AD-particularly the apoE protein's role in AD pathogenesis and how this is affected by APOE variants-remain poorly understood. Identifying missense variants in addition to APOE epsilon 2 and APOE epsilon 4 could provide critical new insights, but given the low frequency of additional missense variants, AD genetic cohorts have previously been too small to interrogate this question robustly.

Objective To determine whether rare missense variants on APOE are associated with AD risk.

Design, Setting and Participants Association with case-control status was tested in a sequenced discovery sample (stage 1) and followed up in several microarray imputed cohorts as well as the UK Biobank whole-exome sequencing resource using a proxy-AD phenotype (stages 2 and 3). This study combined case-control, family-based, population-based, and longitudinal AD-related cohorts that recruited referred and volunteer participants. Stage 1 induded 37 409 nonunique participants of European or admixed European ancestry, with 11868 individuals with AD and 11 934 controls passing analysis inclusion criteria. In stages 2 and 3, 475 473 participants were considered across 8 cohorts, of which 84513 individuals with AD and proxy-AD and 328 372 controls passed inclusion criteria. Selection criteria were cohort specific, and this study was performed a posteriori on individuals who were genotyped. Among the available genotypes, 76 195 were excluded. All data were retrieved between September 2015 and November 2021 and analyzed between April and November 2021.

Main Outcomes ans Measures In primary analyses, the AD risk associated with each missense variant was estimated, as appropriate, with either linear mixed-model regression or logistic regression. In secondary analyses, associations were estimated with age at onset using linear mixed-model regression and risk of conversion to AD using competing-risk regression.

Results A total of 544 384 participants were analyzed in the primary case-control analysis; 312 476 (57.4%) were female, and the mean (SD; range) age was 64.9 (15.2; 40-110) years. Two missense variants were associated with a 2-fold to 3-fold decreased AD risk: APOE epsilon 4 (R251G) (odds ratio, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.33-0.59; P = 4.7 x 10(-8)) and APOE epsilon 3 (V236E) (odds ratio, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.25-0.56; P = 1.9 x 10(-6)). Additionally, the cumulative incidence of AD in carriers of these variants was found to grow more slowly with age compared with noncarriers.

Conclusions and Relevance In this genetic association study, a novel variant associated with AD was identified: R251G always coinherited with epsilon 4 on the APOE gene, which mitigates the epsilon 4-associated AD risk. The protective effect of the V236E variant, which is always coinherited with epsilon 3 on the APOE gene, was also confirmed. The location of these variants confirms that the carboxyl-terminal portion of apoE plays an important role in AD pathogenesis. The large risk reductions reported here suggest that protein chemistry and functional assays of these variants should be pursued, as they have the potential to guide drug development targeting APOE.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
American Medical Association (AMA) American Medical Association (AMA), 2022. Vol. 79, no 7, p. 652-663
National Category
Neurology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-485997DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2022.1166ISI: 000805557100003PubMedID: 35639372OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-485997DiVA, id: diva2:1702435
Funder
European Commission, 890650Available from: 2022-10-10 Created: 2022-10-10 Last updated: 2024-01-15Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedhttps://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaneurology/fullarticle/2793004

Authority records

Ingelsson, Martin

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Belloy, Michael E.Thomassen, Jesper QvistHe, ZihuaiIngelsson, MartinRamirez, AlfredoLambert, Jean-Charles
By organisation
Geriatrics
In the same journal
JAMA Neurology
Neurology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 143 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf