uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Ambivalent Peace: External Peacebuilding, Threatened Identity and Reconciliation in Bosnia and Herzegovina
Uppsala University, Humanistisk-samhällsvetenskapliga vetenskapsområdet, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Peace and Conflict Research.
2007 (English)Doctoral thesis, monograph (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

This study expands the enquiry of external efforts to build peace after an ethnic war by investigating the effects these efforts may have on societal security and reconciliation among groups in a host society. To achieve this, a theoretical framework, combining theories on the character of external peacebuilding, and theories on societal security and reconciliation, was devised and applied to the case of Bosnia and Herzegovina. The contemporary model of peacebuilding is conceptualised and studied in terms of its identity-building and state-building components. Further, the concept of societal security is used to explain the notion of threatened identity and its protection, and its relation to reconciliation, as the process of attitudinal change needed to develop a minimum of mutual acceptance between former adversaries. The empirical part is based on qualitative interviews with members of the political elite, and a sociological survey undertaken among ordinary citizens. The attitudes of 22 politicians from 10 political parties, as well as the attitudes of 2,500 interviewees from different parts of the country, are analysed with the aim of probing the theoretical construct. The theoretical and methodological approach proved useful in uncovering pertinent aspects of an ambivalent peace process. Both interviews and survey data show that ethnonational groups continue to threaten each other by competing demand for ethnic rights and security, while external nation-building measures further exacerbate this state of societal insecurity. As a result, ethnonational identities remain highly mobilised and play an important role in the lives of ordinary people and politicians alike. This situation, in which each community is focused on protecting its own identity, including a particular view of the causes and character of the recent war, rather than seeking a rapprochement with the former opponent, is a key characteristic of ambivalent peace. The results are important for both theories of peacebuilding and their implementation, and call for a reassessment of current models.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Uppsala: Institutionen för freds- och konfliktforskning , 2007. , 421 p.
Series
Report / Department of Peace and Conflict Research, ISSN 0566-8808 ; 78
Keyword [en]
Peace and conflict research, Peacebuilding, Nation-Building, State-Building, Identity, Societal Security Dilemma, Reconciliation, Bosnia and Herzegovina
Keyword [sv]
Freds- och konfliktforskning
Research subject
Peace and Conflict Research
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-8224ISBN: 978-91-506-1950-8 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-8224DiVA: diva2:170764
Public defence
2007-10-13, Auditorium Minus, Museum Gustavianum, Uppsala, 10:00
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2007-09-28 Created: 2007-09-28Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

By organisation
Department of Peace and Conflict Research

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 2151 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf