Logo: to the web site of Uppsala University

uu.sePublications from Uppsala University
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Hold tight or loosen up?: Functional consequences of a shift in anther architecture depend substantially on bee body size
Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA, Scotland, UK.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5663-8025
2022 (English)In: Oecologia, ISSN 0029-8549, E-ISSN 1432-1939, Vol. 200, no 1-2, p. 119-131Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

A fundamental question in pollination ecology is how pollinators affect the evolution of different floral forms. Yet functional effects of shifts in floral form for plant and pollinator are frequently unclear. For instance, flowers that conceal pollen within tube-like anthers that are spread apart and move freely (free architecture) or are tightly joined together (joined architecture) have evolved independently across diverse plant families and are geographically widespread. Surprisingly, how their bee pollinators affect the function of both architectures remains unknown. We hypothesised that bee body size would affect foraging success and pollination differently for free and joined anther architectures. Therefore, we modified the anther architecture of a single plant species (Solanum elaeagnifolium) and used a single species of generalist bumble bee (Bombus impatiens), which varies greatly in body size. We found that on free anther architecture, larger bees were better pollinators. More pollen on their bodies was available for pollination and they deposited more pollen on stigmas. Conversely, on joined anther architecture, smaller bees were better pollinators. They collected less pollen into their pollen baskets, had more pollen on their bodies available for pollination, and deposited more pollen on stigmas. While we also found modest evidence that plants benefit more from joined versus free anther architecture, further investigation will likely reveal this also depends on pollinator traits. We discuss potential mechanisms by which pollinator size and anther architecture interact and implications for floral evolution.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer Nature, 2022. Vol. 200, no 1-2, p. 119-131
National Category
Ecology Evolutionary Biology Botany
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-488021DOI: 10.1007/s00442-022-05246-0ISI: 000842428400001PubMedID: 35989366OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-488021DiVA, id: diva2:1709188
Available from: 2022-11-08 Created: 2022-11-08 Last updated: 2023-04-20Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Vallejo-Marín, MarioRussell, Avery L.
In the same journal
Oecologia
EcologyEvolutionary BiologyBotany

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 29 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf