Logo: to the web site of Uppsala University

uu.sePublications from Uppsala University
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
How Much Pollen Do Beelike Floral Vibrations Remove from Different Types of Anthers?
Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, Scotland, United Kingdom.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5663-8025
2022 (English)In: International journal of plant sciences, ISSN 1058-5893, E-ISSN 1537-5315, Vol. 183, no 9, p. 768-776Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Premise of research. Bees rely on pollen for growth and reproduction and have evolved a variety of behaviors to remove pollen from plants with diverse floral morphologies. Notably, some bees use vibrations generated by their thoracic muscles to remove pollen from flowers. These floral buzzes can effectively remove pollen from species with poricidal flowers (e.g., anthers that open through small apical pores). However, little is known about the effectiveness of floral buzzes in removing pollen from nonporicidal flowers. Here, we compare pollen release in species and with (Solanum rostratum, Solanum dulcamara, and Solanum lycopersicum; Solanaceae) and without (Sinapis alba and Raphanus caudatus; Brassicaceae) poricidal anthers.

Methodology. We used a shaker and a laser vibrometer (for calibration) to apply controlled mechanical vibrations of different magnitudes (amplitude velocity) to flowers and used a particle counter to estimate the relative and absolute number of pollen grains removed. Pollen release under different vibration amplitude velocities was analyzed using a linear mixed effects model.

Pivotal results. Floral buzzes removed, proportionally, more pollen in nonporicidal than in poricidal flowers. Yet because poricidal flowers contain significantly more pollen grains per flower, buzzing poricidal flowers result in more pollen grains removed per buzz. As expected, pollen release increased with amplitude velocity of the applied vibrations.

Conclusions. Our results show that floral buzzing is an effective behavior for removing pollen from different types of floral morphologies, and we suggest that the less frequent buzzing of nonporicidal flowers may be explained by the potentially high energetic costs of producing thoracic vibrations when pollen can be gathered by less expensive means.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
University of Chicago Press, 2022. Vol. 183, no 9, p. 768-776
National Category
Botany Evolutionary Biology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-488022DOI: 10.1086/722296OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-488022DiVA, id: diva2:1709190
Available from: 2022-11-08 Created: 2022-11-08 Last updated: 2024-10-29Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records

Vallejo‐Marín, Mario

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Vallejo‐Marín, Mario
In the same journal
International journal of plant sciences
BotanyEvolutionary Biology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 83 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf