uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
A thematic comparison of seven quality systems at a university hospital: Different types and aspects of quality systems
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences. (Socialmedicinsk epidemiologi)
(Socialmedicinsk epidemiologi)
2006 (English)In: Health Policy, ISSN 0168-8510, Vol. 76, no 2, 125-133 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2006. Vol. 76, no 2, 125-133 p.
National Category
Public Health, Global Health, Social Medicine and Epidemiology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-96704OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-96704DiVA: diva2:171365
Available from: 2008-02-08 Created: 2008-02-08 Last updated: 2017-03-15
In thesis
1. Quality Management in Hospital Departments: Empirical Studies of Organisational Models
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Quality Management in Hospital Departments: Empirical Studies of Organisational Models
2008 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

The general aim of this thesis was to empirically explore the organisational characteristics of quality systems of hospital departments, to develop and empirically test models for the organisation and implementation of quality systems, and to discuss the clinical implications of the findings.

Data were collected from hospital departments through interviews (n=19) and a nation-wide survey (n=386). The interviews were analysed thematically and organisational models were developed. Relationships among aspects of organisation and implementation were hypothesised and analysed with structural equation modelling.

The result was a new framework with three organisational aspects of quality systems each with two sub-aspects: structure (resources and administration), process (culture and cooperation), and outcome (evaluation of goal achievement and development of competence).

Strong positive relationships were confirmed among structure, process, and outcome. Quality systems could therefore be classified into three organisational degrees. For instance, quality systems of high organisational degree often had adequate resources and administration as well as positive organisational cultures and high cooperation among different professions.

Advanced designs required quality systems of high organisational degrees. Examples of such designs were coordination between departments, random check ups, and accreditation.

The organisationally demanding quality systems had been implemented through cooperative implementation, that is, directed by managers while at the same time giving opportunities for staff to participate in planning and designing.

The results can be useful to managers, quality coordinators, and clinicians when they describe, develop, implement, and evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of quality systems in hospital departments.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis, 2008. 75 p.
Series
Digital Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Medicine, ISSN 1651-6206 ; 309
Keyword
Social medicine, Quality Management, Organisational Models, Hospital Departments, Socialmedicin
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-8428 (URN)978-91-554-7082-1 (ISBN)
Public defence
2008-03-03, Rudbecksalen, Rudbecklaboratoriet, Dag Hammarskjölds väg 20, Uppsala, 13:15
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2008-02-08 Created: 2008-02-08 Last updated: 2010-12-30Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Westerling, Ragnar
By organisation
Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences
Public Health, Global Health, Social Medicine and Epidemiology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 625 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf