uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Factor structure in the Camberwell Assessment of Need
Uppsala University, Medicinska vetenskapsområdet, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Neuroscience.
2004 In: British Journal of Psychiatry, Vol. 185, 505-510 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2004. Vol. 185, 505-510 p.
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-96712OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-96712DiVA: diva2:171379
Available from: 2008-02-14 Created: 2008-02-14Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. The Camberwell Assessment of Need as an Outcome Measure in Community Mental Health Care
Open this publication in new window or tab >>The Camberwell Assessment of Need as an Outcome Measure in Community Mental Health Care
2008 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

The aim of this thesis was to critically examine the current use of the Camberwell Assessment of Need (CAN) in outcome assessment for service evaluation. A further aim was to propose a metric for assessing the adequacy of community mental health services in meeting ongoing needs over longer stretches of time.

We made four prospective follow-up studies of CAN assessments of patients with severe mental illness in community-based mental health care.

A factor analysis (n=741) gave support for a three-factor model, comprising only 60% of the CAN items. Need assessments (n= 92) in 1997 and 2003 were compared at both the summed total and the underlying item levels of the CAN. The mean total scores did not change, yet there were significant changes in the underlying items. Changes in mean number of needs between 1997 and 1999 were measured (n=262) with both total scores, summed over all CAN items, and with sub-total scores, summed over two sets of items reflecting the social services and the psychiatric services respectively. As indicated by the sub-total scores, all significant changes occurred within the psychiatric services, a result not possible to discern from the total scores. The Met Needs Index (MNI), defined by us as the aggregate measure of beneficial outcome, indicated that needs in general were met during 71% of the intervals between the annuals assessments from 1997 through 2004. However, the variation among particular items was large.

In conclusion, the summary scores typically used as outcome measures are likely to conceal meaningful variation at the item level. Nevertheless, sub-total scores, being more transparent, might be more useful in outcome assessment. The MNI is a continuous, normally distributed metric, estimable over any number of consecutive assessments, which seems suitable for assessing the achieved benefit of services for patients with long-term ongoing needs.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis, 2008. 55 p.
Digital Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Medicine, ISSN 1651-6206 ; 310
Psychiatry, needs assessment, outcome measures, mental health care, health service evaluation, severe mental illness, psychotic disorders, Psykiatri
urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-8439 (URN)978-91-554-7085-2 (ISBN)
Public defence
2008-03-06, Föreläsningssalen, Museum Gustavianum, Akademigatan 3, Uppsala, 13:15
Available from: 2008-02-14 Created: 2008-02-14 Last updated: 2011-01-12Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

By organisation
Department of Neuroscience

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 163 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link