Logo: to the web site of Uppsala University

uu.sePublications from Uppsala University
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Cranioplasty in Brain Tumor Surgery: A Single-Center Retrospective Study Investigating Cranioplasty Failure and Tumor Recurrence
Section of Neurosurgery, Department of Neuroscience, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2810-4552
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Sciences, Neurosurgery.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2869-2873
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Sciences, Neurosurgery.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5105-0508
2023 (English)In: World Neurosurgery, ISSN 1878-8750, E-ISSN 1878-8769, Vol. 170, p. e313-e323Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

OBJECTIVE: Cranioplasty with synthetic implant can be performed to restore function and form of the skull after resection of malignancy infiltrating the bone. The aim of this study was to examine the rate of implant failure and tumor recurrence in patients undergoing nonautologous cranioplasty and tumor resection.

METHODS: In this retrospective single-center study, 48 patients were identified who had undergone cranioplasty with synthetic implants after tumor resection between 2010 and 2020. The medical records were analyzed to investigate patient demographics, surgery data, cranioplasty failure rates, and rate of tumor recurrence.

RESULTS: Cranioplasty failed in 8 patients. The median time to implant failure was 220 days with most failures occurring within 1 year (5 of 8). There was no significant difference in rate or time to failure between the different cranioplasty materials (P = 0.39). Low body mass index (P < 0.05), previous craniectomy/cranioplasty (P < 0.05), previous radiation therapy to the brain/skull (P < 0.05), and skin closure with sutures (P < 0.05) were associated with an increased risk of implant failure. Tumors recurred in 15 patients.

CONCLUSIONS: Cranioplasty surgery with synthetic implants carries a relatively high risk of failure, regardless of type of cranioplasty material used. Skin closure with staples may be beneficial in these patients.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2023. Vol. 170, p. e313-e323
Keywords [en]
CNS tumors, Cranioplasty, Cranioplasty failure, Postoperative complications, Synthetic implant
National Category
Surgery Biomaterials Science
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-490861DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.11.010ISI: 000946199900001PubMedID: 36356841OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-490861DiVA, id: diva2:1719390
Available from: 2022-12-15 Created: 2022-12-15 Last updated: 2023-04-14Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records

Ryttlefors, MatsSundblom, Jimmy

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Lönnemark, OlleRyttlefors, MatsSundblom, Jimmy
By organisation
Neurosurgery
In the same journal
World Neurosurgery
SurgeryBiomaterials Science

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 119 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf