Logo: to the web site of Uppsala University

uu.sePublications from Uppsala University
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Environmental commitments and rhetoric over the Pandemic crisis: social media and legitimation of the AIIB, the EAEU, and the EU
Univ Cambridge, Dept Polit & Int Studies, Cambridge, England..ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2319-0682
Leuphana Univ Luneburg, German Inst Global & Area Studies, Leibniz Jr Res Grp, Legitimat Strategies Reg Org Legro, Hamburg, Germany..
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute for Russian and Eurasian Studies. CSIC, IAE, Spanish Council Sci Res, Inst Econ Anal, Barcelona, Spain..ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5099-5294
2022 (English)In: Post-Communist Economies, ISSN 1463-1377, E-ISSN 1465-3958, Vol. 34, no 5, p. 577-602Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

How do international organisations (IOs) legitimise their right to rule in times of a Pandemic? Where are their previously made environmental commitments on their agenda during a crisis? What are the differences in self-legitimation, if any, across different types of IOs? These questions have gathered renewed urgency during the ongoing COVID-19 and climate change crises posing a threat to the legitimacy not only of national governments but also of IOs. The paper aims to address these questions through the analysis of environmental commitments made in legal documents of three IOs (the EU, the EAEU, and the AIIB) and through the analysis of their respective social media between 2017 and 2021. Among other issues, we find significant differences in self-legitimation strategies of these three IOs as reflected by their social media and some evidence of mimicry across these IOs that should remain on the agenda for further studies.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Taylor & Francis, 2022. Vol. 34, no 5, p. 577-602
Keywords [en]
International organisations, environmental politics, self-legitimation, legitimacy, AIIB, EAEU, EU, pandemic, COVID-19
National Category
Political Science (excluding Public Administration Studies and Globalisation Studies)
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-494298DOI: 10.1080/14631377.2021.1954824ISI: 000685937400001OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-494298DiVA, id: diva2:1728027
Available from: 2023-01-17 Created: 2023-01-17 Last updated: 2023-08-28Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records

Obydenkova, Anastassia

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Hall, Stephen G. F.Obydenkova, Anastassia
By organisation
Institute for Russian and Eurasian Studies
In the same journal
Post-Communist Economies
Political Science (excluding Public Administration Studies and Globalisation Studies)

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 35 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf