uu.sePublications
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
The significance of the default : A study in environmental law methodology with emphasis on ecological sustainability and international biodiversity law
2009 (English)Doctoral thesis, monograph (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

The legal operationalisation of ecological sustainability concerns all levels of legal control. The ensuring of full biodiversity is an indispensible component of ecological sustainability. At the same time, biodiversity losses continue to be a serious problem in many regions of the world. The international community has responded to this dilemma by strengthening international biodiversity law as well as agreeing upon a particular biodiversity target. The aim is to reduce biodiversity losses at all levels by the year 2010. From a legal point of view this seems unproblematic. When, however, the international legal order is viewed as an overarching control system, composed of several multi-levelled and interacting international and national legal systems (controlling programs), questions on whether the order can actually work for biodi-versity seem inevitable.

By applying and developing further environmental law methodology (ELM) the study argues that some fundamental principles of the international legal order are either diminishing or counteracting the possible realisation of ecological sustainabil-ity and the 2010 biodiversity target of halting and reversing the biodiversity loss. This, as will be argued, is due to rule of law and to how the default actually functions in the international legal system. In line with the above, the prime objective of the study is to develop and elaborate a theory framework on which the theory of the significance of the default is based; second, to evaluate and discuss some fundamen-tal principles of the international legal order and international biodiversity law in the light of the theory, and finally to evaluate and discuss the possible realisation of ecological sustainability and the 2010 target. The study’s method is to a certain extent pluralistic, but it is basically an adapted version of ELM.

Place, publisher, year, pages
Uppsala: Universitetsbiblioteket, 2009. 333 p.
Keyword [en]
Environmental law, international law, international biodiversity law, environmental law methodology, the default of law
National Category
Law and Society
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-9546 (URN)978-91-506-2056-6 (ISBN)oai:DiVA.org:uu-9546 (OAI)diva2:173192 (DiVA)
Public defence
2009-03-05, IX, Main University Building, SE-751 05 Uppsala, 10:00
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from2009-02-06 Created:2009-02-06Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1662 kB)1114 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1662 kBChecksum MD5
7e5c019e86f99402cbcef82414c8f83bd67afb664a55dc122abf7aafc09f9699cf10b4a7
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Jóhannsdóttir, Aðalheiður
By organisation
Department of Law
Law and Society

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 1114 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available
Total: 1445 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link