uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Attitudes to mode of hysterectomy: a survey-based study among Swedish gynecologists
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Women's and Children's Health. (Klinisk och experimentell reproduktionsbiologi/Olovsson)
Dept. of Clinical and Experimental Medicine Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden.
Dept. of Clinical and Experimental Medicine Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2009 (English)In: Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, ISSN 0001-6349, E-ISSN 1600-0412, Vol. 88, no 3, 267-74 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

OBJECTIVE: To determine gynecologists' attitudes to mode of hysterectomy on benign indication. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Sweden. POPULATION: Members of the Swedish Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology. METHODS: A postal questionnaire. Questions examined attitudes to mode of hysterectomy based on three clinical scenarios with different conditions of the uterus. Gynecologists were also asked to estimate how the distribution of the different modes of benign hysterectomy should be overall. The modes to choose were total abdominal, subtotal abdominal, laparoscopic or vaginal hysterectomy (VH). Analyses were performed with multiple logistic regression and multivariate analysis of covariance. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Preferred mode of hysterectomy in the three scenarios and distribution of modes of hysterectomy. RESULTS: VH was the most preferred method in general as well as when the uterus was of normal size, whereas subtotal and total abdominal hysterectomy were the most favored methods when the uterus was enlarged. VH was more often preferred by male compared to female gynecologists as a personal preference. The choice and distribution of mode varied significantly between place of work, seniority and in the quantity of yearly performed hysterectomies. The minimal invasive methods, vaginal and laparoscopic hysterectomy, were recommended in more than 50% of the overall suggested distribution. CONCLUSION: Personal choice of mode of hysterectomy does not seem to strictly follow evidence-based recommendations, but varies significantly between gynecologist's gender, type of clinical setting in which the gynecologist works, seniority and by how many hysterectomies the gynecologist does annually.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2009. Vol. 88, no 3, 267-74 p.
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-106767DOI: 10.1080/00016340802649824ISI: 000263704300006PubMedID: 19241224OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-106767DiVA: diva2:226574
Available from: 2009-07-02 Created: 2009-07-02 Last updated: 2017-12-13Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed
By organisation
Department of Women's and Children's Health
In the same journal
Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 417 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf