uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Is it wise to combine environmental and labour market policies?: An analysis of a Swedish subsidy programme
Natl Inst Econ Res.
Natl Inst Econ Res.
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Economics.
2008 (English)In: Ecological Economics, ISSN 0921-8009, E-ISSN 1873-6106, Vol. 65, no 3, 547-558 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

In 1998 the Swedish government launched its largest ecological subsidization programme to date, the Local Investment Programme (LIP). By having two political objectives; to step up the pace at which Sweden transforms into an ecologically sustainable society and to reduce unemployment, the programme did not conform to the "one-instrument-per-objective" policy guideline often advocated by economists. Concentrating on a subset of the subsidized projects, the projects for we evaluate how effectively the LIP's separate political remediation of contaminated sites, objectives were fulfilled. Between 1998 and 2002,,C 670 million (SEK 6.2 billion) were allocated to over 1800 different projects under the LIP. Twenty-four, i.e. one percent, of the projects aimed at remediation of contaminated sites. These projects received a disproportionate amount, six percent, of the total LIP subsidies. By using data on both accepted and rejected remediation projects, we find that the LIP's ecological sustainability objective could have been achieved better if the most hazardous sites had been prioritized to a greater extent. Furthermore, society's cost for the employment opportunities generated in the remediation projects was higher than society's cost for the equivalent number of employment opportunities generated in traditional labour market policies. Although other subsets of the LIP projects may have been more successful in achieving the programme's separate objectives, our results illustrate inefficiencies that may arise from a desire to attain several political objectives through a single policy instrument.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2008. Vol. 65, no 3, 547-558 p.
Keyword [en]
allocation, contaminated sites, policy evaluation, remediation, subsidies
National Category
Research subject
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-108547DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.07.027ISI: 000255604200011OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-108547DiVA: diva2:236268
Available from: 2009-09-22 Created: 2009-09-22 Last updated: 2011-01-11Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text
By organisation
Department of Economics
In the same journal
Ecological Economics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 196 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link