uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Feeding ecology of juvenile turbot Scophthalmus maximus and flounder Pleuronectes flesus at Gotland, Central Baltic Sea
Gotland University, Department of Biology. (Ar Research Station)
2007 (English)In: Journal of Fish Biology, ISSN 0022-1112, E-ISSN 1095-8649, Vol. 70, no 6, 1877-1897 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Food and feeding of juvenile turbot Scophthalmus maximus and flounder Pleuronectes flesus were studied in five nursery areas at Gotland, Central Baltic Sea, ICES SD 27 and SD 28. Ontogeny involved partitioning of available food resources. The food choice of turbot <30 mm standard length (L sub(S)) included both planktonic-hyperbenthic prey (calanoid copepods and mysids) and epibenthic-endobenthic prey (chironomids and amphipods), whereas turbot greater than or equal to 30 mm L sub(S) fed mainly on hyperbenthic species (mysids and fishes). Conversely, for flounder, epibenthic-endobenthic prey were the most abundant prey items throughout development (harpactocoid copepods, oligochaetes and chironomids for fish <40 mm L sub(S) and oligochaetes, chironomids and amphipods for flounder greater than or equal to 40 mm L sub(S)). Thus, the highest degree of dietary overlap occurred between turbot <30 mm and flounder greater than or equal to 40 mm. Food composition for both turbot and flounder varied, however, according to exposure and predominant wind direction in the nursery area. For example, expressed as the ratio between the biomass of mysids and fishes consumed, the relative importance of mysids v. fishes as food source for turbot, varied from <1 in the most sheltered area to 16 and 27 in the more open areas. Considerable differences in feeding incidence were recorded; mean plus or minus s.d. 58 plus or minus 20% for turbot <30 mm L sub(S) and 83 plus or minus 8% for turbot greater than or equal to 30 mm L sub(S), as opposed to greater than or equal to 85-90% for flounder irrespective of size. The lower feeding success of turbot <30 mm L sub(S) was related to mysid abundance, shown to vary spatially and temporally, and to density of flounder, indicating that food availability, and potentially interspecific competition, influence feeding of early juvenile turbot with implications for survival following settlement. Regarding variability in abundance, hyperbenthic prey, as mysids, are considered more variable than epi- and endobenthic organisms. Hence, in addition to the 'nursery size hypothesis', i.e. the positive relationship between abundance of recruits and extension of nursery areas, variability in food availability may explain the average lower recruitment of turbot as compared to other flatfishes, e.g. flounder.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
London: Academic Press , 2007. Vol. 70, no 6, 1877-1897 p.
Keyword [en]
dietary overlap, feeding ecology, feeding incidence, flatfishes, food availability, sandy beach
National Category
Ecology
Research subject
Biology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hgo:diva-169DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2007.01463.xOAI: oai:DiVA.org:hgo-169DiVA: diva2:275930
Available from: 2009-11-09 Created: 2009-11-09 Last updated: 2017-12-12Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records BETA

Nissling, Anders

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Nissling, Anders
By organisation
Department of Biology
In the same journal
Journal of Fish Biology
Ecology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 507 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf