uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The role of national culture in the headquarters-subsidiary relationship in the multinational corporation: the effect of power distance
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Business Studies.
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Business Studies.
2010 (English)In: Managing the Contemporary Multinational: The Role of Headquarters / [ed] Ulf Andersson and Ulf Holm, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar , 2010, 254-280 p.Chapter in book (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
Abstract [en]

In this chapter we study how national cultural differences affect the managerial relationship between MNC headquarters and their subsidiaries. We argue that the headquarters and their subsidiaries have cultural characteristics deriving from the countries in which they are based that matter to headquarters’ management of their subsidiaries. Furthermore, it is not just the cultural distance that affects the headquarters-subsidiary relationship, but the actual cultural characteristics of both parties. We investigate this empirically, focusing on how both headquarters and subsidiary positions on the cultural dimension of power distance (the acceptance of unequal distribution of power in a society) relate to headquarters’ influence on the competence development of the subsidiary. Our dataset is comprised of 1552 subsidiaries in six European countries and their corresponding headquarters in 27 countries distributed throughout the world. ANCOVA analysis shows that the headquarters exerted the greatest influence when both the headquarters and its subsidiary belong to national cultures with a high power distance. Findings also show that headquarters’ influence is more dependent upon the subsidiary’s grade of power distance acceptance than on that of headquarters. Our findings confirm that the cultural distance metaphor should be replaced with a concept that does more justice to the actual cultural interface in a managerial relationship.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Cheltenham: Edward Elgar , 2010. 254-280 p.
National Category
Business Administration
Research subject
Business Studies
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-110385ISBN: 978-1-84844-807-0 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-110385DiVA: diva2:276977
Available from: 2009-11-13 Created: 2009-11-13 Last updated: 2013-11-05

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Authority records BETA

Drogendijk, RianHolm, Ulf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Drogendijk, RianHolm, Ulf
By organisation
Department of Business Studies
Business Administration

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 568 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf