uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Processes and Outcomes of Distributor Brand New Product Development: An Exploratory Examination
Nofima.
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Business Studies.
2010 (English)In: International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, ISSN 0959-0552, E-ISSN 1758-6690, Vol. 38, no 5, 379-395 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Purpose – Most new product development (NPD) studies focus on manufacturer brands; few consider distributor brands. This paper investigates whether NPD processes and outcomes differ between manufacturers and distributors. 

Design/methodology/approach - Interviews within the grocery industry in Norway and analysis of sales numbers from an AC Nielsen ScanTrack database illustrate that through different NPD processes manufacturers and distributors reach different outcomes.

Findings – Distributors differ from manufacturers in the NPD process in several ways: more in-store interaction resulting in very market-driven products. They usually outsource technical development, and launch brands with substantially less market communication through fewer marketing channels. Distributors, who mostly develop copycat products of large volume manufacturer brands, have lower failure rates. More surprising, the study reveals that distributor brands achieve faster growth in market share than manufacturer brands when brand concentration is low, and some low volume distributor brands have a higher average retail price than manufacturer brands, indicating that different private label categories exist.

Research limitations/implications –The sample had only three product categories (pizza, juice, and jam). Replication with other categories in other industries would help validate the results. The distributor NPD process and outcomes are still not well understood, and as distributors move into more value-added products it will evolve, requiring further research.

Originality/value – This is one of the first empirical investigations of differences in NPD processes and outcomes between manufacturer and distributer brands. It also shows the effect of brand concentration on distributor brand growth.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2010. Vol. 38, no 5, 379-395 p.
Keyword [en]
Distributor brand New product development Brand concentration
National Category
Business Administration
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-119783DOI: 10.1108/09590551011037590OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-119783DiVA: diva2:300973
Available from: 2010-03-02 Created: 2010-03-02 Last updated: 2017-12-12Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records BETA

Sallis, James

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Sallis, James
By organisation
Department of Business Studies
In the same journal
International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management
Business Administration

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 496 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf