uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Relationships among ERP post-implementation success constructs: An analysis at the organizational level
Department of Financial & Information Management, Cape Breton University, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Business Studies.
NAV Solutions, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Business Studies.
2010 (English)In: Computers in human behavior, ISSN 0747-5632, Vol. 26, no 5, 1136-1148 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Abstract: Enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems implementation success factors have been widely researched, however, few have investigated ERP post-implementation success in organizational contexts. The paucity of research Into ERP system success evaluations partly motivates this research To that end, the objective of this study is twofold First, it primarily investigates the relationships among six constructs or dimensions in a respecified ERP system success measurement model, which was developed from prior relevant frameworks. Second, this research adds to the body of knowledge in the information system (IS) success evaluation domain, especially with its focus on ERP packages The extended ERP system success model was tested using data collected in a cross-sectional field survey of 109 firms in two European countries Structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to test six relevant hypotheses. The SEM results showed that five out of the six hypotheses have significant, positive associations. Namely, the constructs of System Quality, Service Quality, Individual Impact, Workgroup Impact, and Organizational Impact have strong relevance in ERP success conceptualization, whereas Information Quality does not, at least, in the context of our data. The pertinence of the study's findings for IS success evaluation as well as its implications for practice and research are discussed.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2010. Vol. 26, no 5, 1136-1148 p.
Keyword [en]
Enterprise resource planning (ERP), Information system (IS) success, Measurement model, ERP post-implementation success, ERP system success constructs, Structural equation modeling
National Category
Business Administration Computer and Information Science
Research subject
Business Studies
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-127067DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.020ISI: 000279138000038OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-127067DiVA: diva2:328571
Available from: 2010-07-05 Created: 2010-07-05 Last updated: 2010-12-29Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text
By organisation
Department of Business Studies
In the same journal
Computers in human behavior
Business AdministrationComputer and Information Science

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 422 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf