uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Waist circumference alone predicts insulin resistance as good as the metabolic syndrome in elderly women
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Medicinska och farmaceutiska vetenskapsområdet, centrumbildningar mm , Centre for Clinical Research, County of Västmanland.
Show others and affiliations
2008 (English)In: European journal of internal medicine, ISSN 0953-6205, E-ISSN 1879-0828, Vol. 19, no 7, 520-526 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: Insulin resistance (IR) is a risk factor for diabetes and atherosclerotic diseases. The metabolic syndrome (MetS) reflects IR. Waist circumference (WC) is the most easily registered component of MetS. The objective was to compare WC alone with MetS as defined by the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) and the International Diabetes Federation (W) for their abilities to predict IR in elderly without known diabetes. Methods: The study included 223 women and 2 10 men comprising 70% of a random sample of 75-year-olds from a general population. IR was conventionally defined as the gender-specific upper quartile of the Homeostasis Model Assessment-Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) index in individuals without known diabetes. Results: 1) The positive association between WC and IR is stronger in women than in men. 2) WC > 88 cm alone is nearly as good as MetS, using NCEP criteria, in predicting IR in women. 3) According to the ROC curve, the optimal cut-off point for WC predicting IR was between 96 and 97 cm (men) and between 88 and 89 cm (women). The relative risk of IR was 5.6 (95% CI: 3.1-11.9) for women with WC > 88 cm and 1.9 (1.5-2.8) for men with WC > 96 cm. 4) The NCEP criteria predicts IR significantly better than the IDF criteria. Conclusion: WC > 88 cm in women indicates a high likelihood of IR and is almost as good as MetS defined using the NCEP criteria in predicting IR. MetS defined using the NCEP criteria predicts IR better than MetS defined using the IDF criteria. (C) 2008 European Federation of internal Medicine. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2008. Vol. 19, no 7, 520-526 p.
Keyword [en]
Insulin resistance, Metabolic syndrome, Waist circumference, Gender, ROC curve
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-129276DOI: 10.1016/j.ejim.2008.01.018ISI: 000262013400010OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-129276DiVA: diva2:342765
Available from: 2010-08-11 Created: 2010-08-10 Last updated: 2017-12-12Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text
By organisation
Centre for Clinical Research, County of Västmanland
In the same journal
European journal of internal medicine
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 356 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf