uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Managing knowledge across boundaries in healthcare when innovation is desired
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Informatics and Media.
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Informatics and Media.
Karolinska institutet.
2010 (English)In: Knowledge Management & E-Learning: An International Journal, ISSN 2073-7904, E-ISSN 2309-5008, Vol. 2, no 2, 134-153 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The purpose of this study is to explore how knowledge can be managed across boundaries when implementing innovations in the healthcare sector is desired, in this specific case a healthcare quality register. The research is based on a qualitative, case study approach and comprises methodologies such as semi-structured interviews and document analysis. Critical incidents analysis is used to discern significant events in the course of innovation implementation. The findings of this study describe knowledge transferred across boundaries on a syntactic, semantic, and pragmatic level. On the syntactic level, knowledge of the innovation was transferred by training sessions for healthcare staff and through information to patients. On the semantic level, knowledge was transferred by knowledge brokering in the professional community of rheumatologists, and by creating collective stories and encouraging rheumatologists to “try” the innovation to find added value. Moreover, allowing the innovation process to take time and realising that knowledge to some extent is tacit, were solutions to some of the challenges on the semantic level. On the pragmatic level, there were explicit conflict of interest between physicians and healthcare authorities as well as resistance from some rheumatologists to share knowledge of patients and treatment. These challenges were met by encouraging the use of the register to improve health status of patients instead of control and further stressing the common goal of healthier patients given the right treatment. The paper is concluded with implications for innovation practice in healthcare drawn from the study and ends with remarks about challenges ahead.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Hong Kong: The University of Hong Kong , 2010. Vol. 2, no 2, 134-153 p.
Keyword [en]
Knowledge Management, Knowledge Boundaries, Healthcare, Innovation, Healthcare Quality Register
National Category
Media and Communications
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-132524OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-132524DiVA: diva2:358232
Available from: 2010-10-21 Created: 2010-10-21 Last updated: 2017-12-12Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

http://kmel-journal.org/ojs/index.php/online-publication/article/viewFile/62/44

Authority records BETA

Edenius, Mats

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Edenius, Mats
By organisation
Department of Informatics and Media
In the same journal
Knowledge Management & E-Learning: An International Journal
Media and Communications

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 439 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf