uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Differential White Blood Cell Count and Type 2 Diabetes: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cross-Sectional and Prospective Studies
Show others and affiliations
2010 (English)In: PloS one, ISSN 1932-6203, Vol. 5, no 10, e13405- p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]


Biological evidence suggests that inflammation might induce type 2 diabetes (T2D), and epidemiological studies have shown an association between higher white blood cell count (WBC) and T2D. However, the association has not been systematically investigated.


Studies were identified through computer-based and manual searches. Previously unreported studies were sought through correspondence. 20 studies were identified (8,647 T2D cases and 85,040 non-cases). Estimates of the association of WBC with T2D were combined using random effects meta-analysis; sources of heterogeneity as well as presence of publication bias were explored.


The combined relative risk (RR) comparing the top to bottom tertile of the WBC count was 1.61 (95% CI: 1.45; 1.79, p = 1.5*10(-18)). Substantial heterogeneity was present (I(2) = 83%). For granulocytes the RR was 1.38 (95% CI: 1.17; 1.64, p = 1.5*10(-4)), for lymphocytes 1.26 (95% CI: 1.02; 1.56, p = 0.029), and for monocytes 0.93 (95% CI: 0.68; 1.28, p = 0.67) comparing top to bottom tertile. In cross-sectional studies, RR was 1.74 (95% CI: 1.49; 2.02, p = 7.7*10(-13)), while in cohort studies it was 1.48 (95% CI: 1.22; 1.79, p = 7.7*10(-5)). We assessed the impact of confounding in EPIC-Norfolk study and found that the age and sex adjusted HR of 2.19 (95% CI: 1.74; 2.75) was attenuated to 1.82 (95% CI: 1.45; 2.29) after further accounting for smoking, T2D family history, physical activity, education, BMI and waist circumference.


A raised WBC is associated with higher risk of T2D. The presence of publication bias and failure to control for all potential confounders in all studies means the observed association is likely an overestimate.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2010. Vol. 5, no 10, e13405- p.
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-133582DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013405ISI: 000283045300009OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-133582DiVA: diva2:370275
Available from: 2010-11-16 Created: 2010-11-11 Last updated: 2012-05-10Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text
By organisation
Department of Medical SciencesCentre for Clinical Research, County of Västmanland
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 164 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link