Long-run effects on longevity of a nutritional shock early in life: The Dutch Potato famine of 1846-1847
2010 (English)In: Journal of Health Economics, ISSN 0167-6296, Vol. 29, no 5, 617-629 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Nutritional conditions in utero and during infancy may causally affect health and mortality during childhood, adulthood, and at old ages. This paper investigates whether exposure to a nutritional shock in early life negatively affects survival at older ages, using individual data. Nutritional conditions are captured by exposure to the Potato famine in the Netherlands in 1846-1847, and by regional and temporal variation in market prices of potato and rye. The data cover the lifetimes of a random sample of Dutch individuals born between 1812 and 1902 and provide individual information on life events and demographic and socioeconomic characteristics. First we non-parametrically compare the total and residual lifetimes of individuals exposed and not exposed to the famine in utero and/or until age 1. Next, we estimate survival models in which we control for individual characteristics and additional (early life) determinants of mortality. We find strong evidence for long-run effects of exposure to the Potato famine. The results are stronger for boys than for girls. Boys and girls lose on average 4, respectively 2.5 years of life after age 50 after exposure at birth to the Potato famine. Lower social classes appear to be more affected by early life exposure to the Potato famine than higher social classes. These results confirm the mechanism linking early life (nutritional) conditions to old-age mortality. Finally, higher food prices at birth appear to reduce later life mortality of children of farmers from higher social classes. We interpret this as an income effect.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2010. Vol. 29, no 5, 617-629 p.
Nutrition in early life, Famine, Longevity, Natural experiments, Survival analysis
Medical and Health Sciences Social Sciences
IdentifiersURN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-134692DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2010.06.001ISI: 000282250700001OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-134692DiVA: diva2:373532