uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Combining the perspectives of midwives and doctors improves risk assessment early pregnancy
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Women's and Children's Health. (Internationell kvinno- & mödrahälsovård/Lindmark)
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Women's and Children's Health, International Maternal and Child Health (IMCH). (Internationell kvinno- & mödrahälsovård/Lindmark)
2007 (English)In: Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, ISSN 0001-6349, E-ISSN 1600-0412, Vol. 86, no 2, 177-184 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background. Traditionally, risk identification in early pregnancy in Swedish antenatal care [ANC] is performed by the midwife at booking, and confirmed by the doctor at a routine visit in early pregnancy, but this extra visit has been questioned. This study compared the risk assessment by the two professions. Methods. In a cluster randomised trial, a planning conference, where midwives reported new mothers to a doctor, replaced the routine consultation with the doctor. Ten ANC-clinics with the new program (942 mothers) were compared to 10 clinics with standard care (758 mothers). Risk factors were registered independently by midwives and doctors. Degree of agreement in risk identification between midwives and doctors was estimated by the kappa coefficient. Results. The degree of agreement in risk registration was good for previous pregnancy complications (κ=0.62; CI: 0.55-0.68), and recommendations for doctor's consultation (κ=0.67; CI: 0.62-0.72); fair for social problems (κ=0.29; CI: 0.03-0.55), and poor for registration of symptoms and problems in index pregnancy (κ=0.09; CI: 0.03-0.21) and psychosocial aspects, such as anxiety (κ=0.09; CI: 0.03-0.21). Significantly more risk factors were registered in the study group. Conclusions: Replacing the routine consultation with the doctor early in pregnancy with a planning conference had no negative impact on risk identification. The results support that the different perspectives of the two professions in combination are important for the safety of surveillance and the psychosocial support expected from antenatal care.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2007. Vol. 86, no 2, 177-184 p.
Keyword [en]
Antenatal care, risk assessment, midwives and doctors, RCT
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-10241DOI: 10.1080/00016340601104021ISI: 000244922700009PubMedID: 17378102OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-10241DiVA: diva2:38009
Available from: 2008-10-02 Created: 2008-10-02 Last updated: 2017-12-11Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records BETA

Berglund, AnnaLindmark, Gunilla

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Berglund, AnnaLindmark, Gunilla
By organisation
Department of Women's and Children's HealthInternational Maternal and Child Health (IMCH)
In the same journal
Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 407 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf