uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Political factors affecting AML/CFT in post-communist Eurasia: the case of Georgia
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Government.
Institute for Security and Development Policy.
2009 (English)In: Journal of Money Laundering Control, ISSN 1368-5201, Vol. 12, no 1, p. 59-73Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of anti-money laundering (AML) efforts and high-risk sectors in Georgia, and explain changes in this field over time.

Design/methodology/approach – This case-study draws on a political economy-approach, based on the argument that “political will” provides the best explanation for the quality of AML efforts in transitional economies, as opposed to “technical assistance” or the sophistication of the domestic financial system.

Findings – The study finds that AML efforts have drastically improved in Georgia following the Rose Revolution, even though significant high-risk sectors remain and a certain tendency towards “selective implementation” of AML regulations can be detected.

Research limitations/implications – Implies that the “political will” of the ruling elite and the promotion thereof should be increasingly incorporated into research on AML, especially as regards explaining the quality of implementation and enforcement of existing laws.

Practical implications – Implies that technical peer evaluations resulting in “naming and shaming” of jurisdictions that do not live up to international AML standards may not in and by themselves be enough to further efficient implementation, but need to be complemented by policies creating incentives for the domestic political elite to encourage de facto implementation of de jureregulations.

Originality/value – Provides the first comprehensive overview of AML efforts in Georgia and points to important explanatory factors underlying changes in this field.

 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
London: Henry Stewart , 2009. Vol. 12, no 1, p. 59-73
Keywords [en]
Georgia, money laundering, law enforcement, government policy
National Category
Political Science (excluding Public Administration Studies and Globalisation Studies) Law (excluding Law and Society)
Research subject
Political Science
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-139852OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-139852DiVA, id: diva2:382238
Available from: 2010-12-30 Created: 2010-12-30 Last updated: 2018-01-12Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

http://www.emeraldinsight.com/journals.htm?issn=1368-5201&volume=12&issue=1&articleid=1765045&show=abstract

Authority records BETA

Jonsson, Michael

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Jonsson, Michael
By organisation
Department of Government
Political Science (excluding Public Administration Studies and Globalisation Studies)Law (excluding Law and Society)

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 401 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf