uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Support-seeking, perceived support, and anxiety in mothers and fathers after children's cancer treatment.
Karolinska institutet, inst f kvinnors och barns hälsa.
2006 (English)In: Psycho-Oncology, ISSN 1057-9249, E-ISSN 1099-1611, Vol. 15, no 4, 335-43 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Description
Abstract [en]

The objective was to examine the relationships between anxiety, the seeking of social support as a coping strategy, and perceived social support among mothers (n=103) and fathers (n=81) of children with successfully completed treatment for cancer. Assessments were done using self-report instruments. The mediating effect of perceived support on the relationship between social support-seeking and anxiety was evaluated through path analysis, and comparisons were done in order to evaluate effects of gender. For mothers and fathers alike, a positive relationship of moderate strength between support-seeking and perceived support was found. Anxiety was negatively related to support-seeking (mothers r=-0.22, p=0.025; fathers r=-0.21, p=0.063) as well as perceived support (mothers r=-0.55, p<0.001; fathers r=-0.41, p<0.001), although the relationship for support-seeking was weak. The path analysis showed that perceived support only to a minor extent could strengthen this association. The significance of support-seeking and perceived support was stronger for mothers than for fathers, as regards their association with anxiety. However, the patterns of interrelations were similar for mothers and fathers. In conclusion, parents' subjectively perceived support appears to be more important for anxiety regulation than their support-seeking coping. In clinical practice, individual variation should be acknowledged, and presumptions of general gender differences avoided.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2006. Vol. 15, no 4, 335-43 p.
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-140102DOI: 10.1002/pon.960PubMedID: 16106491OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-140102DiVA: diva2:382927
Available from: 2011-01-03 Created: 2011-01-03 Last updated: 2017-10-24

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records BETA

Norberg, Annika Lindahl

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Norberg, Annika LindahlBoman, Krister K
In the same journal
Psycho-Oncology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 364 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf