uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Response to Jack Dean Kingsbury, ‘The Significance of the Earthly Jesus in the Gospel of Matthew’
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Theology.
1998 (English)In: Ex Auditu: an international journal of theological interpretation of scripture, ISSN 0883-0053, Vol. 14, 66-69 p.Article in journal (Other academic) Published
Abstract [en]

I argue that Kingsbury equivocates between the Matthean Jesus and the historical Jesus.  In addition, Kingsbury posits a false dichotomy between literary and traditio-historical methods of studying Matthew.  Kingsbury’s study reveals much about the Matthean Jesus but, unfortunately, rather little about the historical Jesus or assessing the latter’s relevance for contemporary theological discussions.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
1998. Vol. 14, 66-69 p.
Keyword [en]
Jack Dean Kingsbury, Gospel of Matthew, Historical Jesus
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-141416OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-141416DiVA: diva2:385570
Available from: 2011-01-11 Created: 2011-01-11

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Authority records BETA

Kelhoffer, James Anthony

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Kelhoffer, James Anthony
By organisation
Faculty of Theology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 352 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf