uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Neural mechanisms underlying target detection in a dragonfly centrifugal neuron.
The University of Adelaide.
(Motion Vision)
The University of Adelaide.
The University of Adelaide.
Show others and affiliations
2007 (English)In: Journal of Experimental Biology, ISSN 0022-0949, E-ISSN 1477-9145, Vol. 210, no 18, 3277-3284 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Visual identification of targets is an important task for many animals searching for prey or conspecifics. Dragonflies utilize specialized optics in the dorsal acute zone, accompanied by higher-order visual neurons in the lobula complex, and descending neural pathways tuned to the motion of small targets. While recent studies describe the physiology of insect small target motion detector (STMD) neurons, little is known about the mechanisms that underlie their exquisite sensitivity to target motion. Lobula plate tangential cells (LPTCs), a group of neurons in dipteran flies selective for wide-field motion, have been shown to take input from local motion detectors consistent with the classic correlation model developed by Hassenstein and Reichardt in the 1950s. We have tested the hypothesis that similar mechanisms underlie the response of dragonfly STMDs. We show that an anatomically characterized centrifugal STMD neuron (CSTMD1) gives responses that depend strongly on target contrast, a clear prediction of the correlation model. Target stimuli are more complex in spatiotemporal terms than the sinusoidal grating patterns used to study LPTCs, so we used a correlation-based computer model to predict response tuning to velocity and width of moving targets. We show that increasing target width in the direction of travel causes a shift in response tuning to higher velocities, consistent with our model. Finally, we show how the morphology of CSTMD1 allows for impressive spatial interactions when more than one target is present in the visual field.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2007. Vol. 210, no 18, 3277-3284 p.
Keyword [en]
Target detection, velocity tuning, contrast dependence, spatial interactions, insect vision, elementary motion detection (EMD)
National Category
Biological Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-148125DOI: 10.1242/jeb.008425ISI: 000249517400021PubMedID: 17766305OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-148125DiVA: diva2:401378
Available from: 2011-03-02 Created: 2011-03-02 Last updated: 2017-12-11

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records BETA

Nordström, Karin

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Nordström, Karin
In the same journal
Journal of Experimental Biology
Biological Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 745 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf